Trump Slams Leakers as ‘Dirty Dogs’ Over Iran War Secrets

On September 17, President Donald Trump took to his preferred social‑media outlet, Truth Social, and let loose a scathing tirade aimed at unnamed members of his own team. In a terse, almost furious post, he labeled the leakers “dirty dogs” and warned they would “pay a big price” if they were ever caught.

The warning came after a flurry of reports surfaced suggesting that there were serious disagreements inside the White House about the ongoing military operation against Iran. One particularly striking claim was that the then‑Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, had reportedly urged Trump to hold back, warning that a full‑scale strike could spiral out of control.

Trump did not name any individuals, leaving the speculation wide‑open. But the tone of his message—sharp, personal, and unmistakably punitive—suggested he believes the leaks are coming from high up, perhaps from staff who have been “feeding sensitive information to the press.”

Observers note that this is not the first time the former president has publicly chastised his own administration. Over the past few months he has repeatedly used his platform to attack perceived disloyalty, ranging from accusations of “fake news” to threats of drastic action against policy advisers he deems unsupportive.

What adds a layer of intrigue is the mention of Tulsi Gabbard. While she served as a congresswoman and ran for president, she was never officially appointed as DNI, making the report puzzling at best. Still, the claim has been quoted by several outlets, underscoring the murkiness surrounding the internal debate on the Iran strategy.

Trump’s remarks also echo his broader narrative about the Iran conflict. He has repeatedly insisted that the United States is “winning very handily,” that Tehran will not obtain a nuclear weapon, and that any escalation is necessary to protect American interests. He has even suggested that the war may cause a temporary spike in gasoline prices, but promised a return to lower rates once the fighting ceases.

The president’s latest salvo is likely to fan the flames of speculation within Washington. Analysts say the administration may be tightening security protocols around classified briefings, and insiders could be scrambling to identify the source of the leaks before they become a bigger political liability.

For now, the “dirty dogs” remain nameless, but the warning serves as a stark reminder that, in Trump’s view, loyalty is non‑negotiable—especially when the stakes involve a potential war with Iran.