Trump Says Pardon Request for Michael Clancy Is a State Issue
- Nishadil
- September 15, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 2 Views
- Save
- Follow Topic
Former President claims he can’t intervene in state‑level case after lawyer’s plea for a pardon
When Michael Clancy’s attorney asked Donald Trump for a presidential pardon, the ex‑president replied that the matter falls under state jurisdiction, not federal authority.
Donald Trump, speaking to reporters on a Saturday afternoon, was asked about a recent letter from the lawyer of Michael Clancy – a Massachusetts businessman currently facing state fraud charges. The attorney, who has been circulating a petition for a presidential pardon, wanted to know whether Trump might consider clemency.
"It’s a state situation," Trump answered, his tone matter‑of‑fact, and then added, "I can’t overstep my authority there." The comment, brief as it was, sparked a flurry of social‑media commentary, with some supporters cheering the clear‑cut response and critics questioning the former president’s willingness to intervene in criminal matters.
Clancy, 48, was indicted earlier this year on allegations that he falsified documents to obtain a state‑funded loan. His legal team argues that the charges are politically motivated and that a federal pardon would wipe the slate clean. They point to Trump’s history of granting clemency in high‑profile cases as precedent.
Trump, however, reminded the press that his pardoning power, as outlined in the Constitution, only applies to federal offenses. "I’ve granted pardons before – you know that – but you can’t use that power for a state case," he said, pausing before noting, "That’s up to the governor, the board of pardons, or the courts in Massachusetts."
The statement left many wondering whether the former president might still have a back‑channel influence. Some political analysts suggested that Trump could lobby the Massachusetts governor, who holds a separate clemency authority, but they cautioned that such a move would be politically risky.
Legal experts echoed the constitutional reality. "The President’s clemency power is limited to federal crimes," said Professor Elaine Rodriguez of Harvard Law School. "Any attempt to intervene in a state prosecution would be beyond the scope of the executive authority granted by Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution."
Meanwhile, Clancy’s lawyer, Jeremy Alvarez, expressed disappointment but not surprise. "We hoped for a different answer, but we understand the legal boundaries," Alvarez said, adding that the team will now explore every possible avenue within Massachusetts’ own clemency system.
As the story develops, the political ramifications are already being weighed. Trump supporters see his answer as a reminder of the limits of presidential power, while critics argue that the former president is shirking a chance to correct what they deem an unjust state prosecution.
Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.