This Week In Space Episode 226: Who Owns The Moon? A Human Look at Space Capitalism
- Nishadil
- September 06, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 7 Views
- Save
- Follow Topic
Exploring Moon Ownership and Space Capitalism on the Latest ‘This Week In Space’ Podcast
Rod Pyle, Tariq Malik and guest Rainer Zitelmann dissect the tangled history of capitalism, ask whether the Moon can be owned, and survey the week’s biggest space headlines.
When you press play on episode 226 of the This Week In Space podcast, you’re in for a conversation that feels a little like a history lecture, a little like a boardroom meeting, and a lot like a sci‑fi brainstorming session. Hosts Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik sit down with Dr. Rainer Zitelmann – a historian‑turned‑entrepreneur – to ask the question that has haunted science‑fiction writers for decades: who, if anyone, can lay claim to the Moon?
Zitelmann opens with a quick tour of capitalism’s rough‑and‑tumble past. He points to the East India Company, a behemoth that turned whole continents into profit machines, and the U.S. trans‑continental railroad, built on the backs of tycoons who weren’t exactly model citizens by today’s standards. “We’ve been good at turning resources into wealth,” he says, “but the ethical ledger is still a mess.” The point? Maybe space gives us a chance to rewrite the rulebook.
From there the discussion drifts into the murky world of extraterrestrial property rights. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty, a kind of United Nations peace‑keeping pact, declares that no nation can claim sovereignty over celestial bodies. But what about private companies? Zitelmann argues that without some form of recognized ownership, the “new space frontier” risks becoming a Wild West where the first to plant a flag simply takes whatever they can carry back.
Listeners hear a blend of historical anecdotes and forward‑looking speculation. Could a lunar mining venture be the 21st‑century equivalent of the East India Company, or will it be a more accountable, profit‑with‑purpose model? The guests don’t pretend to have all the answers, but they make it clear: the conversation about space capitalism has to start now, before the next Falcon 9 lifts off.
After the deep dive, the podcast rolls into its regular roundup of the week’s biggest space stories. NASA’s Roman Space Telescope, lofted into orbit aboard a SpaceX Falcon Heavy, dazzled viewers with a perfect solar eclipse shot – a reminder that even the most massive rockets still have a poetic side. Meanwhile, Blue Origin snagged a $700 million contract to build NASA’s next Mars orbiter, a sign that competition on the Red Planet is heating up.
On the solar system front, Europe’s BepiColombo mission finally reached Mercury after eight years of travel, beginning a new chapter of exploration at the Sun’s nearest neighbor. And for hobbyists, a new model of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 from Estes is now on sale; it’s a surprisingly detailed, launch‑ready replica that costs $149.99, with a 10 % discount code for readers.
For anyone craving a deeper look at the economics of space, the episode also plugs a newly released book – “New Space Capitalism: The Entrepreneurial Path to the Stars” – available via an Amazon affiliate link. The hosts remind us that the conversation doesn’t stop at the podcast; you can join Club TWiT for ad‑free listening and exclusive content.
In short, episode 226 feels less like a polished press release and more like a coffee‑shop chat between people who love space, love history, and love a good debate about who gets to own the next big piece of real estate – even if that real estate is a dusty crater on the Moon.
- UnitedStatesOfAmerica
- News
- SpaceX
- Science
- ScienceNews
- Falcon
- RodPyle
- TariqMalik
- ThisWeekInSpace
- SpacePodcast
- SpacexFalconHeavy
- MoonOwnership
- SpaceLaw
- NasaRomanSpaceTelescope
- NewSpace
- Nasas
- BepicolomboMercury
- Zitelmann
- RainerZitelmann
- SpaceCapitalism
- ExtraterrestrialProperty
- BlueOriginMarsOrbiter
- SpaceNewsRoundup
Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.