The Unthinkable: Even MAGA Loyalists Are Calling Out Trump's New Luxury Resort Design
Share- Nishadil
- January 12, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 8 Views
A Rare Misstep? Trump's Bedminster Resort Villas Face Unexpected Backlash From His Staunchest Supporters
In a surprising turn, some of Donald Trump's most devoted followers are expressing dismay and even outrage over the proposed design for new luxury villas at his Bedminster golf club, calling them 'ugly' and 'woke-looking.'
Well, here's something you don't see every day. In fact, it's pretty darn rare: Donald Trump, a man whose personal brand of luxury and ostentation is usually adored by his base, is now facing a rather surprising wave of criticism from within the very ranks of his MAGA loyalists. And what's got them so riled up, you ask? It's not a policy decision, a political gaffe, or even a contentious tweet. No, this time, the bone of contention is far more aesthetic – it's the design of new, upscale villas planned for his beloved Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey.
You see, when it comes to Donald Trump, his supporters often expect a certain grandiosity, a particular opulent flair that screams 'Trump.' Think gilded everything, sprawling estates, classic architecture. But it seems the proposed look for these new villas, which are apparently going for a cool $2.5 million a pop, has fallen rather spectacularly short of those expectations. In fact, some of the reactions online have been nothing short of scathing. Imagine, if you will, the collective gasp, the disappointed head-shaking among the faithful.
Dive into the depths of pro-Trump online forums, like the popular 'TheDonald' subreddit, and you'll find a veritable storm brewing. The general consensus? These new designs are, to put it mildly, not hitting the mark. One user described them as 'cheap,' another lamented their 'bizarre' appearance, and still others used terms like 'ugly as sin' and 'pathetic.' Perhaps the most pointed criticism, and certainly the most ironic given the political climate, is the accusation that these designs look, wait for it, 'woke.'
It's a fascinating twist, really. Many of these supporters often rally against what they perceive as 'woke' culture influencing everything from corporate branding to modern art. So, to then turn that same lens on their leader's own luxury development is quite the moment. The buildings, from what we can gather, seem to veer away from the traditional, stately architectural style often associated with Trump's other properties, leaning instead towards something more… well, modern, box-like, perhaps even minimalist. And for his base, that's just not cutting it.
Even figures like Brian Glenn from RSBN, a network popular with conservatives, couldn't hold back, flat-out stating that the designs are 'ugly as sin.' This isn't just a few isolated grumbles; it's a visible, albeit somewhat contained, moment of dissent where the unwavering loyalty often associated with Trump's base meets a genuine distaste for something he's put his name on. It speaks volumes about the depth of their aesthetic expectations, doesn't it?
The irony here, of course, is deliciously rich. Trump himself has, on many occasions, been a vocal critic of modern architecture, often decrying its perceived lack of beauty and grandeur. He’s championed classicism and railed against contemporary designs. Now, to have his own project be called 'ugly' and 'woke' by his staunchest defenders—well, that's a narrative twist no one saw coming. It just goes to show, even for a brand as powerful and divisive as Trump's, there are certain lines, certain aesthetic sensibilities, that even the most loyal will not cross without a word or two of genuine complaint.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on