Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Tensions Flare in Greater Kailash-II: RWA Chief Faces FIR Over Allegations of Harassment and Threats

  • Nishadil
  • January 29, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 3 Views
Tensions Flare in Greater Kailash-II: RWA Chief Faces FIR Over Allegations of Harassment and Threats

South Delhi RWA Chief Booked for Alleged Harassment, Criminal Intimidation of Woman

The head of Greater Kailash-II's residents' body, Sarvesh Sharma, is under police investigation after a woman filed an FIR alleging harassment, threats, and misuse of power, stemming from a dispute over community decisions.

Oh, what a mess unfolding in Greater Kailash-II, one of South Delhi’s prominent residential areas! The local community, often a hub of neighborhood camaraderie, is now grappling with a rather serious and unsettling development. Sarvesh Sharma, who helms the Federation of Greater Kailash-II Residents’ Welfare Association (RWA), finds himself in quite a predicament. Police have officially registered a First Information Report, an FIR, against him following allegations of harassment and threats leveled by a woman, a former member of his very own RWA.

Imagine the tension. The complaint, lodged by Kanchan Chander, paints a stark picture of a relationship that spiraled dramatically. She claims that Sharma, in his capacity as the RWA chief, embarked on a campaign of harassment. It’s not just about a simple disagreement; it’s about feeling targeted and intimidated. According to her statement, he allegedly misused his position, casting a long shadow over her peace of mind and, frankly, her standing within the community.

The specific incidents she details are pretty unsettling. Chander alleges she was unceremoniously booted from crucial RWA WhatsApp groups, then her number blocked entirely – essentially, a digital shunning. But it didn’t stop there. She also claims he resorted to spreading false, defamatory information about her and, even more disturbingly, made threats. This whole unpleasant situation, it seems, really escalated after she dared to question a particular RWA decision concerning the installation of CCTV cameras. It just goes to show how quickly community disagreements can turn personal, and nasty.

Interestingly, this isn't the first time such an accusation has surfaced. Chander had, in fact, approached the police earlier regarding similar issues. Back then, Sharma reportedly gave an undertaking, a promise, to refrain from further harassment. One might have hoped that would put an end to the conflict, but alas, it appears the peace was short-lived, leading us to this current, more formal police action.

However, let’s not forget there are two sides to every story, and Sharma vehemently denies all these charges. He insists the allegations are completely baseless and has, quite understandably, expressed his shock and dismay. In his defense, he suggests that Ms. Chander herself has a history of disputes, not just with him but with other residents and even former RWA members. He’s gone so far as to accuse her of defamation, even mentioning that a counter-complaint has been filed against her by a group of women, highlighting the deep rift this whole affair has created within the community.

For now, the legal wheels are in motion. The Delhi Police have registered the FIR under several serious sections of the Indian Penal Code: Section 506 for criminal intimidation, Section 509 for any word, gesture, or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman, and Section 354 for assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty. It's a serious set of charges, indeed. While the investigation is still very much in its early stages, it certainly underscores the responsibilities that come with community leadership, and the critical importance of maintaining civility, even amidst disagreements. Only time, and a thorough police inquiry, will tell us the full story here.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on