Washington | 11°C (overcast clouds)
Pakistan Vows to Honor Makkah Defence Pact Amid Drone Threats

Defence Minister Khawaja Asif says Pakistan will fulfil its duties under the Makkah Agreement after a suspected Houthi drone was intercepted near Mecca.

Pakistan’s defence chief reaffirmed the country’s commitment to the trilateral Makkah pact with Saudi Arabia and Turkey, stressing that safeguarding the holy sites is a duty beyond any treaty.

Speaking to Geo News on Wednesday, Pakistan’s defence minister Khawaja Asif made it clear that Islamabad is ready to live up to every line of the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement. “The pact applies to us and we will fulfil our duty,” he said, echoing a tone of resolve that felt almost inevitable after the recent security scare near Islam’s holiest city.

The agreement – signed on August 7 in Mecca by Pakistan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia – is a straightforward, if ambitious, promise: an armed attack on any one of the three nations will be treated as an attack on all. In other words, collective deterrence in plain language.

That promise was put to the test on Tuesday when Saudi air‑defences reported the interception and destruction of a Houthi‑launched drone south of Mecca. The weapon never breached the city’s prohibited airspace, Saudi officials said, but the episode nevertheless triggered a security alert along the kingdom’s western coast.

The Houthis, however, quickly denied any intention of striking Mecca or any other Islamic shrine. Regardless of their claims, the incident has added another layer of tension to an already volatile region, where Iran‑backed militants have been rattling Saudi territory and menacing maritime traffic in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.

Asif didn’t shy away from the symbolism. “If Makkah is attacked, there is no need for an agreement to protect it,” he told the news channel, stressing that safeguarding the holy sites is a moral duty that transcends any treaty.

He also clarified that the pact’s language leaves “absolutely no ambiguity” about mutual defence – yet he refused to spill any details about Pakistan’s own military plans or strategy, noting that such discussions stay strictly confidential.

On the diplomatic front, Asif said Islamabad had passed Saudi Arabia’s concerns straight to Tehran, hoping to head off any further escalation. “I don’t think Iran as a state will open another front,” he added, pointing out that Tehran is already entangled in other regional conflicts. He distinguished between the Iranian government and non‑state actors like the Houthis, warning that the latter can act without official sanction.

He warned that if Iran were to side openly with the Houthis, it would be “not a prudent course” given Tehran’s delicate ties with other regional players.

Beyond the desert, Asif highlighted the broader economic fallout of the conflict, especially the disruption of vital maritime lanes – the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al‑Mandab. “When those routes choke, trade suffers, and that hits Pakistan’s economy directly,” he said.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, speaking a few hours earlier, echoed the minister’s sentiments, condemning what he called a “dastardly and heinous attempted drone attack” on the Holy Site of Mecca and pledging that Pakistan stands “shoulder to shoulder” with Riyadh.

Both leaders stressed the need for restraint and warned against any steps that could widen the conflict into new theatres. Asif added that the Makkah pact is just one example of nations reshaping security arrangements in response to new threats, hinting that more trilateral or multilateral deals could emerge in the near future.

In short, Pakistan is sending a clear message: whether through treaties or sheer resolve, the country will not sit back while the sanctity of Mecca or the safety of regional trade routes is jeopardised.

Comments 0
Please login to post a comment. Login
No approved comments yet.

Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.