Mike Pereira Breaks Down How the NFL Would Have Dealt With the Michigan‑Western Michigan Clock Mix‑up
- Nishadil
- September 08, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 2 Views
- Save
- Follow Topic
Mike Pereira says the NFL would have ruled in favor of Western Michigan’s win
The Big Ten’s controversial clock decision after Michigan’s comeback sparked outrage, and former NFL referee Mike Pereira says the pro league would have used the TV clock in that scenario.
When the Michigan Wolverines slipped a 13‑12 victory past the Western Michigan Broncos in Week 1, the whole nation thought they’d witnessed a classic Hail‑Mary finish. The clock on the TV screen hit zero, the ball fell incomplete, and the game appeared over. Then the Big Ten announced that a lone second remained on the official clock, giving the Broncos one more chance to win.
That extra tick seemed like a gift from the gods of chaos. Broncos receiver JJ Buchanan caught a short pass from Bryce Underwood and sprinted into the end zone, turning a 12‑7 upset into a 13‑12 triumph. Even NBC’s own rules analyst, Terry McAulay, looked stunned.
The conference tried to explain the discrepancy by saying a Broncos defender had touched the ball after it went out of bounds, which supposedly stopped the clock at one second. But viewers who had been glued to the broadcast felt cheated – how could there be two different clocks?
Enter Mike Pereira, the former NFL officiating chief turned Fox analyst. In a chat with The Athletic, he laid out the NFL’s playbook for exactly this kind of situation. ‘If there’s a mismatch between the official timing system and the video the audience sees, the replay officials use the TV feed,’ he said. ‘That’s the same rule in the NFL, the UFL – you go with the footage everyone is watching.’
In other words, the pro league would have trusted the television clock, not a mysterious “secret” board that only the officials can see. The NCAA, however, hasn’t codified a clear procedure, leaving conferences to improvise.
Western Michigan and the Mid‑American Conference have taken the whole mess in stride, showing a surprising amount of grace. Most of the college‑football world, on the other hand, has been spewing indignation and conspiracy‑theory‑fuel, convinced that two clocks in the same game is an impossibility.
It’s a rare, almost one‑in‑a‑million scenario, but it raises a bigger question: should college football adopt a rule that mirrors the NFL’s – default to the broadcast clock when the two don’t line up? And why aren’t replay reviews and clock‑adjustments shown live on television, so fans can see exactly why a call was made?
For now, the Big Ten’s decision stands, but the conversation about transparency and standardized timing in college football is only just getting started.
Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.