Megyn Kelly Unleashes Fury on Gavin Newsom Over 'Cheap Trick' Trump Post

The political landscape witnessed a fiery exchange recently as conservative media personality Megyn Kelly unleashed a torrent of criticism against California Governor Gavin Newsom. Her fury was ignited after Newsom, a prominent Democratic figure, strategically shared a clip on social media featuring Kelly herself delivering sharp commentary on former President Donald Trump.

Newsom's post was a calculated move, aiming to highlight apparent divisions within the Republican-leaning media or to leverage Kelly's words against Trump.

The clip in question showcased Kelly expressing concerns regarding Trump's electability in the upcoming election, a point she had made on her SiriusXM show, 'The Megyn Kelly Show'. This tactic immediately drew a furious response from Kelly, who felt her words were being taken out of context and weaponized for partisan gain.

Kelly did not mince words, swiftly taking to her own platforms to denounce Newsom's actions.

She branded the Governor's move as a "cheap trick" and a "desperate" attempt to score political points. "He's trying to 'own' me," Kelly asserted, making it clear she viewed the post as an act of exploitation rather than genuine engagement with her commentary. Her outrage underscored a common frustration among media personalities when their statements are selectively edited or repurposed by political adversaries.

Crucially, Kelly moved to clarify the nuanced position behind her initial criticism of Trump.

She emphasized that her remarks were focused on his electability in a general election context, rather than a repudiation of his policies or a withdrawal of her support. Kelly reiterated her intention to vote for Trump, signaling that her previous comments were a pragmatic assessment of his electoral prospects, not a defection from his base.

This distinction was vital to her, serving to counter the narrative Newsom's post attempted to construct.

This incident offers a stark illustration of modern political maneuvering, where clips and soundbites are weaponized across social media to fuel narratives and divide opponents. Newsom's play was textbook: identify a perceived crack in the opposition's front and exploit it for maximum impact.

Kelly's equally passionate rebuttal demonstrates the fierce protection public figures exert over their messaging, especially when it risks being misconstrued or used to bolster opposing political agendas.

Ultimately, this skirmish between Kelly and Newsom is more than just a personal spat; it's a microcosm of the broader media and political ecosystem.

It highlights how commentary, even from figures within a sympathetic ideological sphere, can be co-opted and spun to serve different political masters, often leading to swift and vocal pushback from the original speaker. In an age of instant sharing and viral content, controlling the narrative remains a paramount, and often contentious, battleground.