Major Security Shake-Up: Centre Withdraws CM Rekha Gupta's Z-Category CRPF Protection

In a swift and notable development, the Union government has made a significant alteration to the security arrangements of Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, revoking her Z-category protection provided by the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). The decision, effective immediately, now places the responsibility for the Chief Minister's security entirely in the hands of the Delhi Police.

The Z-category security cover is one of the highest levels of protection in India, typically involving a robust team of 33 personnel, including CRPF commandos and state police officers.

CM Gupta, a first-time Chief Minister, had been granted this elite protection by the Union Home Ministry as recently as March of this year, underscoring the perceived threat assessment at the time.

Such modifications to VVIP security protocols are usually a direct result of comprehensive threat perception reviews conducted by various intelligence agencies.

These assessments are dynamic, constantly evaluating potential risks and evolving security landscapes to ensure appropriate protection levels are maintained for high-profile individuals. While no specific reasons for the withdrawal have been publicly disclosed, the move aligns with standard government procedures for reassessing security needs.

This decision comes on the heels of similar adjustments to the security details of other prominent political figures.

Recently, the Centre also modified the Z-plus security of former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav. These instances collectively suggest a broader re-evaluation of central security deployments for key political personalities, a move that often sparks considerable discussion and speculation within political circles regarding underlying motivations and evolving power dynamics.

With the CRPF commandos now withdrawn, the Delhi Police will assume full charge of CM Rekha Gupta's security, ensuring her continued safety.

The shift marks a notable chapter in the ongoing narrative of high-profile security management, where governmental decisions often reflect a complex interplay of threat assessments, administrative policies, and the prevailing political climate.