Karur Tragedy: DMK's Murasoli Slams Actor Vijay Over 'Irresponsible' Crowd Management and Political Ambitions

The tragic stampede in Karur, which claimed the lives of four women during a Pongal gift distribution event, has ignited a fiery political debate, with the DMK's official mouthpiece, Murasoli, placing the blame squarely on actor Vijay and his fan club, Vijay Makkal Iyakkam. In a scathing critique, Murasoli didn't hold back, labeling the incident as a stark demonstration of "irresponsible" and "careless" conduct, particularly given the actor's perceived political aspirations.

The core of Murasoli’s accusation centers on a critical flaw: actor Vijay’s significant delay in arrival.

Eyewitness accounts and reports suggest that hundreds, primarily women, had gathered hours in advance, enduring the scorching sun with little to no proper arrangements for shade, water, or seating. This prolonged wait, coupled with the sudden rush upon Vijay’s eventual appearance, created a volatile situation ripe for disaster.

The publication argues that such a large-scale event, drawing massive crowds, demands meticulous planning and robust crowd control mechanisms, which were conspicuously absent.

Murasoli’s editorial goes beyond mere event management, delving into the broader implications for Vijay’s nascent political journey.

The question posed is stark: if an individual cannot effectively manage a gift distribution event without fatal consequences, how can they possibly be entrusted with the far greater complexities of governing a state? This incident is framed as a premature and damning indictment of his organizational capabilities and political readiness, casting a shadow over his recent overtures towards public service.

The article also draws parallels to past incidents involving political leaders, specifically mentioning the dangers associated with "freebie culture" and the potential for chaos when large gatherings are poorly managed.

It subtly hints at the lessons unlearned from similar tragedies involving distribution events by figures like Jayalalithaa and Sasikala, suggesting a pattern of disregard for public safety in the pursuit of political mileage.

The deaths of the four women – Pappathi, Valarmathi, Suganthi, and Alamelu – are not just statistics; they are a tragic consequence, according to Murasoli, of a fundamental failure in leadership and responsibility.

The publication demands accountability, urging a deeper reflection on the ethics of such events and the heavy price paid when political ambitions overshadow basic safety protocols. The Karur stampede, therefore, stands as a grim reminder and a potent warning to those aspiring for political power without adequately preparing for its inherent responsibilities.