George Conway's Fiery Warning: A Comey Indictment Would Be Unconstitutional and Politically Motivated

George Conway, a highly respected conservative lawyer and vocal critic of former President Donald Trump, has issued a stark and unwavering warning against any potential indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. In a compelling legal analysis, Conway emphatically declares that such an indictment, particularly concerning Comey’s actions during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, would not only be unconstitutional but also a perilous act of political retribution that threatens the very foundation of America’s justice system.

Conway's argument is rooted in fundamental principles of due process and the appropriate use of prosecutorial power.

He contends that an indictment against Comey would be a clear example of "malicious prosecution" or "selective prosecution," driven by political opponents rather than genuine criminal wrongdoing. The notion that Comey could face criminal charges for decisions made in the course of his official duties as FBI director, however controversial those decisions might have been, crosses a dangerous line into weaponizing the Department of Justice for political ends.

At the heart of the matter are Comey's public statements regarding the Clinton email probe in 2016.

While these actions drew significant criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, Conway posits that they do not constitute a criminal offense. He specifically addresses the argument that Comey "usurped" the role of the Attorney General by making public declarations, asserting that while this might have been a deviation from protocol or even an error in judgment, it does not amount to a prosecutable crime.

To suggest otherwise, Conway argues, would be to criminalize policy disagreements and official discretion.

The implications of such an indictment, according to Conway, are profound and deeply troubling. It would set a chilling precedent, signaling that future government officials could face criminal charges based on the political whims of a subsequent administration.

This would not only erode the independence of institutions like the FBI but also create an environment where officials are paralyzed by fear of politically motivated legal attacks, rather than focusing on their duties. Conway's impassioned plea underscores the critical importance of safeguarding the justice system from becoming a tool for settling political scores.

His analysis serves as a powerful reminder of the constitutional safeguards designed to prevent such abuses and maintain the integrity of legal proceedings, urging a robust defense against what he perceives as a profound threat to American jurisprudence.