Ethiopia Unleashes Fiery Rebuttal Against Egyptian ‘False Claims’ Over Mega-Dam

In a powerful and unequivocal statement, Ethiopia has vehemently rejected what it terms as 'false and misleading claims' from Egypt concerning the ongoing construction and filling of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). The long-standing dispute over the colossal hydroelectric project on the Blue Nile has once again flared, with Addis Ababa asserting its sovereign right to utilize its natural resources for development and poverty alleviation, while pushing back against what it perceives as an attempt to undermine its progress.

The Ethiopian Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a strong condemnation of recent Egyptian pronouncements, which included accusations of Ethiopia taking unilateral actions that threaten downstream water security.

Ethiopia, for its part, has consistently maintained that the GERD is a pivotal development project, crucial for lifting millions out of poverty by providing much-needed electricity. The dam is designed to be Africa's largest hydroelectric power plant, a beacon of hope for a nation striving for economic transformation.

At the heart of Egypt's concerns lies the potential impact on its vital water supply from the Nile, on which it relies for over 90% of its freshwater needs.

Cairo has repeatedly called for a legally binding agreement on the dam's operation and filling schedule, fearing severe reductions in water flow during periods of drought and initial filling phases. This deep-seated apprehension stems from historical agreements, largely colonial-era, that Egypt believes grant it significant water rights – agreements Ethiopia has long deemed inequitable and obsolete.

Ethiopia, however, insists that its construction and filling processes are being carried out responsibly and in accordance with international principles.

It highlights its commitment to a Declaration of Principles signed in 2015, which calls for cooperation and avoiding significant harm. Addis Ababa argues that Egypt's claims often exaggerate potential negative impacts, while failing to acknowledge Ethiopia's reasonable and legitimate developmental aspirations.

The diplomatic volley underscores the urgent need for a political resolution to the GERD saga, which has become a significant point of contention in the Horn of Africa.

Despite mediation efforts by the African Union and other international actors, a comprehensive agreement remains elusive. Ethiopia has continuously called for a fair and equitable solution that respects the rights of all riparian states, emphasizing that the dam will ultimately benefit the entire region through stable electricity supply and improved water management.

As the GERD moves closer to full operational capacity, the rhetoric between the two nations is likely to remain charged.

Ethiopia's firm stance reflects its determination to complete the project that has become a symbol of national pride and a cornerstone of its future prosperity. The international community watches closely, hoping for a peaceful resolution that ensures water security and development for all nations along the majestic Nile River.