Defense Attorney Claims Crucial Video Could Exonerate Scottdale Day Care Worker

A compelling legal battle is currently unfolding in Westmoreland County, centered around Amy Lynn Johnson, a Scottdale day care worker accused of child abuse. However, her defense attorney, Duke George, stands firm in his belief that crucial video evidence will decisively clear his client's name, adding a significant twist to the ongoing investigation.

Johnson, 44, faces severe charges of child endangerment and simple assault.

These allegations stem from an incident on February 15 at the Small Wonders Daycare, where, according to the criminal complaint filed by state police Trooper Scott Kemerer, Johnson allegedly struck a 2-year-old child in the head. This accusation has naturally caused considerable concern within the community and led to her subsequent arrest.

Despite the grave nature of the charges, Attorney George maintains an unwavering conviction that the truth, as captured by the day care center's security cameras, will present a starkly different account of events.

"I think the video is going to show that my client did absolutely nothing wrong," George stated with confidence. He adamantly refutes the claim that Johnson intentionally struck the child, suggesting instead that any contact was either misinterpreted or constituted a non-aggressive redirection.

The defense's strategy and confidence hinge entirely on this surveillance footage.

George asserts that the video will unequivocally demonstrate Johnson's actions, contending that it will effectively dispel the current allegations and conclusively prove her innocence. "We fully intend to use the video at her preliminary hearing," he confirmed, signaling a readiness to directly challenge the prosecution's narrative with irrefutable visual evidence.

Following her arrest, Johnson was arraigned before District Judge Charles Christner and subsequently released on $5,000 unsecured bail.

The legal proceedings are now poised for a pivotal moment, with all attention directed toward the upcoming preliminary hearing where the much-anticipated video evidence is expected to be presented. This case serves as a powerful reminder of the critical role surveillance technology can play in legal processes, offering potential clarity and objective proof in situations marked by conflicting accounts and serious allegations.