CJI Gavai Quells Storm: Reaffirms Profound Respect for All Faiths Amid Khajuraho Remarks Row

In a significant move to clarify his stance and quell a burgeoning controversy, Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai has emphatically reiterated his deep-seated respect for all religions. His clarification comes in the wake of remarks he made regarding the explicit sculptures found at the ancient Khajuraho temples, which had, for a brief period, ignited a spirited public discussion and attracted widespread attention.

During a recent court proceeding, CJI Gavai had reportedly commented on the explicit nature of certain Khajuraho idols, observing that such depictions would likely face legal scrutiny under contemporary obscenity laws.

These observations, though made in a legal context, were interpreted by some as potentially critical or dismissive of India's rich cultural and religious heritage, particularly concerning Hindu temple art. The ensuing debate sparked a flurry of reactions across various platforms, prompting the need for an official clarification from the highest judicial office.

Addressing the matter directly, CJI Gavai underscored that his personal views should never be misconstrued as an affront to any particular faith.

"I respect all religions equally," he stated unequivocally, aiming to douse the flames of misinterpretation. He further elaborated that his comments were purely academic, made within the framework of legal discourse, and did not reflect any personal prejudice or disrespect towards religious beliefs or artistic expressions associated with them.

To further illustrate his commitment to religious pluralism and his own personal faith, the CJI highlighted a recent visit to a revered Jain temple.

This personal anecdote served as a tangible testament to his inclusive outlook, demonstrating that his professional observations in a legal setting do not diminish his personal reverence for India's diverse spiritual landscape. His clarification seeks to reaffirm the judiciary's impartial and respectful approach towards all communities and faiths, ensuring that the discourse remains centered on understanding rather than divisive interpretations.

The incident underscores the delicate balance required when public figures, especially those in high office, make observations that can be interpreted through various lenses.

CJI Gavai's swift and clear clarification is a testament to the judiciary's commitment to maintaining public trust and fostering an environment of mutual respect in a religiously diverse nation.