Washington | 22°C (broken clouds)
Census 2027: Can Its Numbers Turn Into an NRC?

Why the 2027 Census Data Can’t Straightforwardly Become a National Register of Citizens

Former Deputy Registrar General K. Narayanan Unni unpacks the legal and administrative walls separating the Census from the National Population Register, and why fears of an NRC built on census data merit scrutiny.

When the next decennial census rolls around, it always sparks a flurry of questions – not just about population counts, but about how that data might be used later. This time, a familiar worry has resurfaced: could the figures gathered for Census 2027 be repurposed to create a National Register of Citizens (NRC)?

To cut through the noise, The Hindu spoke with K. Narayanan Unni, who served as Deputy Registrar General of India. He explains, in plain language, why the census and the National Population Register (NPR) – the two most commonly‑cited sources for an NRC – are not interchangeable.

First, the legal foundations differ. The Census of India is mandated by the Constitution under Article 324A and is purely statistical. Its purpose is to inform policy, allocate resources, and shape development plans. By contrast, the NPR is a living database, collected under the Citizenship Act 1955 and the Foreigners Act 1948, intended to record details of every usual resident – name, age, address, and citizenship status – on a continual basis.

Because the census is a snapshot taken every ten years, it lacks the real‑time updates that an NRC would demand. “You can’t build a dynamic register on a static picture,” Unni says. “Even if you tried, the legal basis would be shaky, since the census is not designed to determine citizenship.”

Beyond the law, there are administrative hurdles. The census is overseen by the Office of the Registrar General, while the NPR falls under the Ministry of Home Affairs. Different ministries mean different data‑handling protocols, privacy safeguards, and accountability mechanisms. Mixing the two without clear legislative backing could breach citizens’ right to privacy, a concern highlighted by the Supreme Court in recent judgments.

That said, Unni acknowledges why the fear exists. Both exercises collect personal details – names, dates of birth, and addresses – and both generate massive databases. In a climate of heightened political debate, it’s easy for a slip of language or a mis‑interpreted statistic to fuel alarm.

His bottom line? Any move to use census numbers for an NRC would require a fresh law, a separate data‑collection exercise, and robust safeguards. Until then, the 2027 Census will remain, as intended, a tool for planning and governance – not a shortcut to an NRC.

Comments 0
Please login to post a comment. Login
No approved comments yet.

Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.