BJP Won't Interfere in AIADMK's Internal Affairs, Asserts Nainar Nagenthran Amidst Alliance Talks

In a firm declaration amidst swirling political speculation, BJP MLA Nainar Nagenthran has unequivocally stated that his party maintains a strict policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of any other political entity. Addressing reporters in Tirunelveli, Nagenthran’s comments primarily focused on dispelling notions of BJP involvement in the ongoing leadership dynamics within the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), a key player in Tamil Nadu politics.

The statement comes at a crucial juncture, with the political landscape of Tamil Nadu heating up in anticipation of the upcoming Lok Sabha elections.

Nagenthran emphasized that issues such as who holds the position of General Secretary or Coordinator within the AIADMK are purely internal matters for that party to resolve, asserting that the BJP has no intention or business meddling in such decisions. This clear demarcation aims to quash persistent rumours and criticisms suggesting the BJP exerts undue influence over its potential allies.

Elaborating on the BJP's strategy for the forthcoming polls, Nagenthran articulated the party's primary objective: to solidify its presence and enhance its strength across Tamil Nadu.

While acknowledging the BJP's desire for an alliance with the AIADMK for the Lok Sabha elections, he made it clear that any final decision on such a partnership would rest squarely with the national leadership. Senior figures like Union Home Minister Amit Shah and BJP national president J.P. Nadda are the ultimate arbiters of alliance formation, underscoring the centralized nature of the party's strategic planning.

Significantly, Nagenthran did not rule out alternative paths for the BJP if an alliance with the AIADMK does not materialize.

He suggested that the party is prepared to contest independently or forge alliances with other smaller parties, demonstrating a flexible and pragmatic approach to electoral politics. This stance signals the BJP's determination to make significant inroads in the state, irrespective of the complexities of existing political relationships.

Furthermore, Nagenthran took aim at the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), asserting that they lack the moral authority to comment on the BJP's actions or internal workings.

He sharply criticized the DMK, implying that they should address their own 'family issues' before casting aspersions on other parties. This retort highlights the competitive and often acrimonious nature of political discourse in the state.

Nagenthran's address provides a window into the BJP's strategic thinking in Tamil Nadu.

By reaffirming a policy of non-interference while keeping alliance options open, the party seeks to project an image of principled autonomy while simultaneously pursuing its electoral ambitions. The coming months will undoubtedly reveal how these declarations translate into concrete political alignments and outcomes on the ground.