Bill Maher Pokes Fun at LA’s ‘Left or Further Left’ Mayoral Choice
- Nishadil
- November 08, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 8 Views
- Save
- Follow Topic
Bill Maher jokes that Los Angeles voters only got two options – left or further left – after Nithya Raman’s upset victory
On “Real Time,” Bill Maher quipped that LA’s mayoral race boiled down to ‘left or further left,’ sparking a heated panel discussion about socialism, public‑safety and the city’s political future.
When the results of Los Angeles’ mayoral race finally rolled in, the city’s talk‑show circuit lit up like a Christmas tree. On Friday’s episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, the comedian‑host leaned into the moment with his trademark bluntness.
“We have a new mayor in L.A.,” Maher announced, pausing for effect. “You get two choices in L.A.: left or further left.” The crowd laughed, and the joke set the tone for a lively—if somewhat heated—conversation.
Maher’s comment wasn’t just a punchline; it echoed a sentiment many Angelenos have been voicing since the race narrowed to two familiar faces: City Councilwoman Nithya Raman, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, and incumbent Mayor Karen Bass, a more traditional Democrat. Both candidates carried baggage, and many voters felt they were choosing the lesser of two evils.
One of Maher’s guests, writer‑podcaster Coleman Hughes, leaned into the criticism. “My big issues are high rents and crime,” Hughes said, looking uneasy. “Socialists love rent control, but in practice it can push rents up over the long haul.” He added that the allure of socialism among younger voters, he warned, “isn’t a brand‑new experiment—Karl Marx wrote Das Kapital back in the 1860s.”
Hughes, a former Manhattan Institute fellow, didn’t shy away from the data either. “We’ve got a century of evidence that socialism hurts the economy,” he asserted, a line that drew nods and a few skeptical glances.
Raman’s win, however, isn’t just a talking point for comedians and pundits; it has real‑world stakes. Critics worry about how a mayor aligned with the DSA might reshape public safety. Already, some LAPD officers have warned that attempts to overhaul the department could exacerbate staffing shortages and, ultimately, public‑safety concerns.
Former Mayor Bass was unflinching in her warnings. “Four years under Nithya Raman would be chaos from day one,” she told the Post during the campaign, painting a picture of a city spiraling into disorder. Bass also hinted that a shake‑up at the top of the police force could invite federal scrutiny, especially with the 2028 Olympics on the horizon.
Raman, for her part, has pledged to replace LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell—a move that could trigger a cascade of resignations, according to some senior officers. “I don’t think she has a clue what it takes to lead the nation’s second‑largest police department,” one officer whispered to reporters.
Still, supporters argue that a fresh perspective is exactly what LA needs after years of rising rents, homelessness, and traffic gridlock. They see Raman’s platform—affordable housing, climate action, and a reimagined public‑safety model—as a long‑overdue reset.
As the city settles into its new political reality, the “left or further left” joke will likely be replayed on late‑night shows and in coffee‑shop debates alike. Whether the mayor’s policies will prove pragmatic or, as some fear, utopian, remains to be seen. One thing is clear: Los Angeles is gearing up for a turbulent, and possibly transformative, four‑year term.
Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.