A Mother's Heartbreak: Delhi CM Attacker Driven by Passion for Stray Dogs, Not Malice

In a deeply personal revelation, Rekha Gupta, the distraught mother of Ankit Gupta – the man accused of attacking Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal – has shed light on her son's motivations, painting a picture of a passionate animal lover driven to desperation, not political malice. Speaking out after the incident, Ms.

Gupta articulated that her 39-year-old son, a resident of Karawal Nagar who works in event management, was profoundly disturbed by the Supreme Court's recent order regarding the sterilisation and feeding of stray dogs.

“He is a passionate dog lover,” Rekha Gupta stated, her voice heavy with concern.

“He used to feed stray dogs. He was very disturbed by the Supreme Court’s order that Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) can feed dogs within their premises but must also address dog bite cases. He felt that the issue wasn’t being taken seriously, and his concern grew into a deep-seated anguish.”

The mother elaborated that Ankit's actions were born out of a perceived societal neglect of a critical issue, rather than any political affiliation or malicious intent.

“He has no links with any political party,” she emphasized, dispelling rumors of political motivation. “He was simply consumed by the plight of stray dogs and the challenges posed by dog bites, believing that the authorities were not adequately addressing the complexities of the situation.”

Ankit’s dedication to animal welfare was long-standing, according to his mother.

He had actively engaged in online advocacy, signing numerous petitions and joining various social media groups dedicated to animal rights and the responsible management of stray dog populations. His distress, she explained, escalated as he witnessed what he perceived as a growing crisis – more dog bites, increased public fear, and a seeming lack of concrete solutions from governance.

“He was disturbed mentally by this situation,” Rekha Gupta revealed, hinting at the emotional toll the issue had taken on her son.

Her narrative offers a poignant perspective, portraying Ankit not as a deliberate assailant, but as a deeply troubled individual whose passionate advocacy for a cause he held dear spiraled into a misguided act of desperation. His mother expressed hope that he would learn from this experience, ultimately channeling his fervent dedication towards more constructive avenues for change and advocacy in the future.