Unprecedented Outburst: Advocate Hurls Shoe at Supreme Court Justice B.R. Gavai in Shocking Courtroom Drama

A scene of sheer disbelief unfolded within the hallowed halls of the Supreme Court, as an advocate identified as Rakesh Kishore hurled a shoe at Justice B.R. Gavai. The shocking incident, which occurred during a hearing involving a land dispute case from Jharkhand, sent ripples of consternation throughout the legal fraternity, highlighting a dramatic escalation of frustration and perceived injustice.

The courtroom, typically a bastion of solemnity and decorum, was momentarily stunned into silence as Kishore's projectile missed its intended target, Justice Gavai, who was presiding over a bench with Justice Sandeep Mehta.

This audacious act immediately led to Kishore's detention, marking a new low in the already contentious history of a lawyer known for his erratic behavior and explosive allegations.

Rakesh Kishore is no stranger to controversy. His past is marred by a series of high-profile confrontations and legal battles that paint a picture of a man deeply entrenched in a personal war against the judicial system.

In 2017, he faced serious accusations of assaulting a judge in Jharkhand. The incident was so severe that a medical board in Ranchi subsequently declared him 'mentally unsound,' a label he has consistently challenged.

His grievances primarily stem from a long-standing land dispute case in Jharkhand, which he claims was dismissed without proper hearing.

This personal crusade has led him to file numerous cases and level scathing allegations against a host of legal professionals, including judges and public prosecutors. Kishore's name was even struck off the rolls of the Jharkhand Bar Council, a severe disciplinary action. However, in a surprising turn, the Supreme Court, acknowledging his persistent pleas, allowed him to resume practice on 'humanitarian grounds,' a decision that now seems fraught with unforeseen consequences.

Kishore's family has often portrayed him as a victim, alleging he is being unfairly targeted and framed.

They assert that his seemingly irrational actions are a cry for justice, born out of a profound sense of betrayal by the very system he once swore to uphold. The advocate himself has often claimed to be a 'victim of a judicial scam,' believing he is at the center of a larger conspiracy.

The May 29, 2024, incident serves as a stark reminder of the intense pressures and often volatile emotions that can simmer beneath the surface of the judicial process.

While the act of hurling a shoe is unequivocally condemned as an affront to the dignity of the court, it also prompts a deeper examination into the mechanisms for addressing profound dissatisfaction within the legal system. As Rakesh Kishore faces the repercussions of his actions, the event leaves an indelible mark on the annals of Supreme Court history, sparking debate on judicial decorum, mental health in the legal profession, and the limits of expressing grievance within the confines of justice.