Prominent Industrialist Bina Modi Summoned by Delhi Court in Alleged Assault Case
Share- Nishadil
- February 13, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 6 Views
Bina Modi, Godfrey Phillips India Chairperson, Ordered to Appear in Court Over Assault Allegations
A Delhi court has issued summons to industrialist Bina Modi, chairperson of Godfrey Phillips India, in connection with an alleged assault case involving one of her company's executive directors.
Well, it seems like prominent industrialist Bina Modi, known for her significant role as Chairperson of Godfrey Phillips India (GPI), is now facing a rather serious legal challenge. A Delhi court has recently issued summons, calling her to appear in connection with an alleged assault case. This isn't just a minor internal issue; it involves an executive director from her own company, Mr. Sanjay Singh, and dates back to an incident reported in July of last year.
The incident itself, as alleged, occurred back in July 2023 right at GPI's corporate office in Delhi. According to the complaint lodged, Ms. Modi stands accused of assaulting and even wrongfully restraining Mr. Sanjay Singh. He holds a key position as Executive Director at Godfrey Phillips, so this isn't merely an internal squabble but something that has escalated significantly, leading to police involvement and now, formal court proceedings.
Metropolitan Magistrate Chestha Gupta, presiding over the Patiala House Court, took a crucial step by taking 'cognizance' of the charge sheet filed by the police. For those unfamiliar with legal jargon, 'taking cognizance' essentially means the court has reviewed the evidence presented by the police and has found sufficient grounds to proceed with the trial. It's a significant milestone in any legal case, moving it from investigation to formal prosecution.
Consequently, Ms. Modi has been directed to appear before the court on March 27th. The specific charges she faces are quite serious, painting a picture of deliberate actions: voluntarily causing hurt (Section 323), wrongful restraint (Section 341), criminal intimidation (Section 506), and the concept of common intention (Section 34) of the Indian Penal Code. These sections highlight the gravity of the allegations, implying not just physical harm but also a restriction of freedom and threats.
This development certainly casts a spotlight on the senior leadership within one of India's prominent business houses. As the legal process unfolds, all eyes will undoubtedly be on the proceedings scheduled for late March, as Ms. Modi prepares to respond to these serious allegations in court. It’s a situation that underscores how even high-profile individuals are subject to the legal system when such serious complaints are made.
- India
- News
- Crime
- CrimeNews
- SanjaySingh
- AssaultCase
- IndianPenalCode
- Industrialist
- DelhiCourt
- CctvFootageEvidence
- PatialaHouseCourt
- GodfreyPhillipsIndia
- SamirModi
- BinaModi
- DelhiLegalNews
- LalitBhasin
- LegalSummons
- SurendraPrasad
- WhiteCollarCaseIndia
- CorporateBoardroomRow
- CorporateDisputeCase
- TrialProceedingsIndia
- GrievousInjuryCase
- ChargeSheetMarch2025
- ProtestPetition
- DelhiCourtSummons
- BoardMeetingAssault
- GpiAssaultCase
- PrimaFacieMaterial
- CourtOrderFebruary10
- ExecutiveDirectorAssault
- BnssSection210
- DelhiCourtNews
- CommonIntentionCharge
- GodfreyPhilipsIndia
- Gpi
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on