Kevin Willard’s Fiery Dig at the Inquirer Backfires Over Villanova’s Big 5 Exit
- Nishadil
- October 24, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 9 Views
- Save
- Follow Topic
Villanova coach slams Philadelphia Inquirer reporter, then ends up confirming the story about the Wildcats leaving the Big 5
During a post‑game press conference, Villanova’s Kevin Willard called Jeff Neiburg a “bad writer,” only to reiterate most of the details the Inquirer had reported about the Wildcats’ departure from the historic city rivalry.
At a brief press conference after a 93‑71 loss to Virginia, Villanova head coach Kevin Willard let his frustration boil over, taking aim at Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Jeff Neiburg. Willard accused the journalist of being a “bad writer,” suggesting the story about Villanova’s exit from the Big 5 was either poorly written or unreadable.
What made the outburst oddly ironic was that, line by line, Willard’s own answers echoed the very points Neiburg had laid out. The Inquirer story, published Thursday, explained that the historic Big 5 – a round‑robin of Villanova, Penn, Temple, La Salle and Saint Joseph’s that’s been a Philly staple since 1955 – was being restructured without Villanova after the schools couldn’t agree on a new format beyond this season.
Villanova, the most successful program in the series with 30 titles, had pushed for a different setup: a Hall‑of‑Fame banquet and a schedule that would funnel games into the Xfinity Mobile Arena triple‑header. According to Neiburg, the Wildcats wanted a format that gave the two teams with the highest NET rankings a bye and a home game leading into the Classic – a plan that would have effectively kept Villanova home‑heavy.
Willard dismissed the existing arrangement as “stupid” and blamed the other schools for not being able—or willing—to afford the banquet. He claimed the other ADs “couldn’t afford it, supposedly,” and that the proposed schedule would have helped fans know when games were happening, boosting attendance. Yet the same press conference saw him concede that the other institutions simply didn’t see the proposal the same way.
When pressed about Villanova’s desire to stay in the Big 5, Willard retorted, “Villanova wants to be in the Big 5. They are the Big 5,” before slipping back into a snarky comment about the reporter’s literacy. He even suggested Neiburg only mentioned Villanova to get clicks, saying the headline itself proved it.
In reality, the Inquirer’s piece noted that the five other schools announced they would continue with a round‑robin format that excludes Villanova for 2027‑28. The article also detailed how Villanova’s alternative would have left the Wildcats with almost no road games in the series, a point Willard himself acknowledged.
Multiple sources confirmed that Temple wasn’t the lone holdout; other schools also balked at the Wildcats’ proposal. So, while Willard tried to paint himself as the victim of a misinformed reporter, his remarks largely validated the story he was trying to discredit.
As a side note, Willard had previously told the Inquirer in June 2025 that an annual Atlantic 10 road game was a heavy burden for a team already juggling a 20‑game Big East schedule, hinting at the financial pressures shaping his stance on the Big 5.
Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.