Fingerprint on Rifle Scope Links Accused Trump Assassin to Weapon, FBI Analyst Testifies in High-Stakes Trial
Share- Nishadil
- September 16, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 1 minutes read
- 6 Views

In a gripping development at the federal trial of Yujing Zhang, the man accused of attempting to assassinate former President Donald Trump, an FBI analyst delivered compelling testimony that could be pivotal to the prosecution's case. Jennifer Leon, a seasoned FBI latent print analyst, took the stand to detail how a crucial fingerprint found on a rifle scope directly linked Zhang to the weapon.
Leon testified unequivocally that a fingerprint discovered on a rifle scope, located inside Zhang's vehicle, matched the left middle finger of Yujing Zhang.
This forensic breakthrough places a significant piece of evidence squarely in the hands of the prosecution, bolstering their claims against the Chinese national.
The arrest of Zhang, which occurred near Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, sent shockwaves through the nation. His car, a vehicle laden with suspicious items, was found to contain not just the rifle scope, but also a ballistic vest plate, three formidable knives, a stun gun, and a powerful flashlight.
This arsenal of equipment painted a chilling picture of potential intent.
Earlier proceedings in the trial had already established a pattern of deception, with testimony revealing Zhang had previously provided false statements to the Secret Service. Furthermore, prosecutors introduced a deeply unsettling letter allegedly penned by Zhang to then-President Trump.
In this letter, Zhang reportedly expressed an unsettling desire to join "a royal family," adding another layer of intrigue and concern to the high-stakes legal battle.
Zhang has maintained his innocence, pleading not guilty to the charges leveled against him. Notably, during Leon's testimony, the defense team opted not to cross-examine the FBI analyst, a decision that leaves her evidence unchallenged on the record.
As the trial continues, all eyes remain fixed on the proceedings, awaiting further revelations in this extraordinary case that touches upon national security and presidential protection.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on