Explosive Twist in Immigration Firm Owner's Suicide: Senior Punjab Police Officer Among Six Booked for Abetment
Share- Nishadil
- September 11, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 4 Views

The somber silence surrounding the tragic suicide of Ranjit Singh, a prominent immigration firm owner from Chandigarh, has been shattered by an explosive turn of events. What began as a personal tragedy has now spiraled into a high-profile criminal investigation, implicating senior echelons of the Punjab Police and other influential figures in a disturbing saga of alleged harassment, extortion, and systemic corruption.
Six individuals, including an Assistant Inspector General (AIG) of Punjab Police, have been formally booked for abetment to suicide, shaking the foundations of public trust.
Ranjit Singh, proprietor of the successful immigration consultancy 'Touch Stone,' ended his life on May 17, leaving behind a chilling suicide note.
This detailed testament of despair, penned just hours before his death, laid bare a relentless campaign of mental agony and financial ruin orchestrated by those he accused. His note painted a grim picture of how he was allegedly cornered and coerced, his professional reputation systematically dismantled, and his life made unbearable.
The note specifically named AIG Rajinder Singh of the Punjab Police, Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, lawyer Gurpreet Singh, and three other individuals – Bhupinder Singh, Mandeep Singh, and Satnam Singh – as the primary architects of his suffering.
According to the poignant accusations detailed in the suicide note, Ranjit Singh was ensnared in a convoluted legal battle stemming from a past complaint against his firm.
He claimed that AIG Rajinder Singh, using his position of power, allegedly demanded a hefty sum of Rs 25 lakh to 'settle' the ongoing investigation. The note further detailed how he was allegedly threatened with false implication in another case if he failed to comply with the extortionate demands. This alleged pressure cooker environment, combined with constant harassment and the looming threat of legal repercussions, pushed him to the brink.
The investigation was galvanized by the unwavering resolve of Ranjit Singh's wife, Jaswinder Kaur.
Following her husband's death, she lodged a formal complaint with the Chandigarh Police, recounting the harrowing details of his ordeal and submitting the crucial suicide note as evidence. The police, under immense public scrutiny and the weight of such serious allegations, initiated a thorough probe.
This investigation corroborated the veracity of the claims made in the suicide note, leading to the decisive action of booking the six accused under Section 306 (abetment to suicide) of the Indian Penal Code.
Among the booked individuals, AIG Rajinder Singh's involvement casts a particularly long shadow.
His alleged role in demanding money and exerting undue influence highlights a deeply troubling nexus where power is allegedly wielded for personal gain. The case against Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, lawyer Gurpreet Singh, and the others further underscores the multifaceted nature of the alleged conspiracy, suggesting a coordinated effort to financially exploit and mentally torment the victim.
This tragic incident serves as a stark reminder of the immense pressures faced by individuals navigating complex legal and business landscapes, and the devastating consequences when those sworn to uphold justice allegedly become agents of injustice.
As the investigation progresses, the community watches closely, hoping that the unearthing of this alleged web of corruption will bring not only justice for Ranjit Singh but also a renewed commitment to integrity within the systems designed to protect its citizens. The booking of these high-profile individuals marks a significant step, signaling that no one is above the law, regardless of their position or influence.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on