A Glaring Omission: Tharoor Calls Out Railways for Ignoring Thiruvananthapuram in Vision 2030
Share- Nishadil
- December 28, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 1 Views
Shashi Tharoor Expresses Dismay as Thiruvananthapuram Absent from Railway Ministry's Vision 2030 Document
Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor has voiced his profound disappointment and concern over the conspicuous absence of Kerala's capital city from the Ministry of Railways' recently unveiled 'Vision 2030' document, calling for immediate rectification.
It seems even the most meticulously planned documents can sometimes miss a beat, or in this case, an entire major city! Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor recently didn't mince words, expressing his utter shock and deep dismay upon discovering that Kerala's bustling capital had been completely omitted from the Ministry of Railways' ambitious 'Vision 2030' document. This isn't just a minor oversight; for many, it feels like a glaring neglect of a city that plays a pivotal role in the region's economy and transport.
The 'Vision 2030' document, as you might expect, is supposed to be the definitive blueprint, outlining the future trajectory of Indian Railways. It's meant to paint a picture of upcoming developments, critical projects, and strategic expansions across the nation. So, to find Thiruvananthapuram — a city that, by the document's own definition, falls into the 'Tier 2' category — entirely absent from its pages is, well, baffling, to say the least. One has to wonder how such a significant urban centre could simply vanish from future railway plans.
And let's be clear, Thiruvananthapuram isn't just any city. It's the beating heart of Kerala, the state capital, and a hub for tourism, education, and various industries. When it comes to rail traffic, it consistently ranks high, boasting the second-highest passenger volume in Kerala, right after Ernakulam. The notion that a city of such importance, with its significant daily commuter base and a constant flow of tourists, could be overlooked in a long-term vision document is, frankly, alarming. It begs the question: what message does this send about the city's future development prospects within the railway network?
Tharoor highlighted several crucial projects that are either ongoing or desperately needed for the city's railway infrastructure. Take the Nemom coaching terminal, for instance. This isn't just a fancy add-on; it's absolutely vital for easing the immense congestion at Thiruvananthapuram Central station, which currently struggles with capacity issues. Then there are the long-awaited railway overbridges (ROBs) at spots like Kavaloor, Veli, Thumba, Kazhakoottam, and Pangappara – projects that are essential for smoother traffic flow and enhanced safety. And what about the much-needed redevelopment of Thiruvananthapuram Central itself, or the ever-important suburban railway project, which promises to be a game-changer for daily commuters? Let's not forget the crucial need for speed augmentation of existing lines, perhaps even to accommodate more Vande Bharat-like services. All these are incredibly pertinent to the city's growth and connectivity.
The Member of Parliament didn't just voice his frustration publicly; he has, quite rightly, taken the matter directly to the top. Tharoor has penned a detailed letter to Union Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, not only seeking a comprehensive clarification for this profound omission but also demanding that it be rectified without delay. He stressed that leaving Thiruvananthapuram out sends a worrying signal of potential neglect, which could have far-reaching negative implications for the city's development and its residents' daily lives. It's a situation that, if left unaddressed, could certainly spark considerable political debate and public outcry.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on