Raut Unleashes Fury: Slams Kadam's "Treachery" Over Bal Thackeray Remarks

A political storm is brewing in Maharashtra, ignited by Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut's fiery condemnation of Ramdas Kadam, a prominent figure in the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena faction. Raut didn't mince words, branding Kadam's recent remarks concerning the last days of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray as "unforgivable treachery" and a profound betrayal that has deeply wounded the Thackeray loyalists.

The controversy stems from Kadam's audacious claim that Bal Thackeray's health rapidly deteriorated due to the immense stress caused by Uddhav Thackeray's actions.

Furthermore, Kadam alleged that after the revered Balasaheb's passing, leaders like Raut abandoned Uddhav Thackeray, leaving him isolated. These assertions have struck a raw nerve within the Shiv Sena (UBT) camp, seen as an attempt to rewrite history and tarnish the image of dedicated party members.

In a passionate rebuttal, Raut vehemently dismissed Kadam's narrative as a pack of lies.

"Ramdas Kadam should never have uttered such words," Raut declared, his voice laced with indignation. "He knows the truth, yet he chooses to spread falsehoods. This is not just disloyalty; it's a heinous act of betrayal against the very memory of Balasaheb and his family." Raut emphasized his unwavering presence alongside Bal Thackeray during his final illness, stating unequivocally, "I was always with Balasaheb.

I have been and always will be with Uddhav Thackeray. This is our dharma."

Raut went on to highlight Kadam's alleged history of political opportunism, reminding the public of Kadam's purported attempts to switch allegiance to the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and later the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) during various political junctures.

"Kadam's loyalty has always been questionable," Raut asserted. "He even made attempts to defect to the NCP and BJP. Balasaheb was aware of these machinations, and it was only due to Uddhav Thackeray's intervention that Kadam was retained within the Shiv Sena fold and granted a Legislative Council seat."

The veteran Shiv Sena (UBT) leader further recounted a critical moment where Kadam, despite being a close confidante, failed to visit Bal Thackeray when he was gravely ill, choosing instead to attend a family function.

"Balasaheb had sent for him, but Kadam prioritized a wedding," Raut revealed, painting a picture of Kadam's alleged lack of true devotion. "This is the same person who now dares to question our loyalty. His remarks are a stain on Balasaheb's legacy and a direct attack on those who truly stood by him."

This intense war of words underscores the continuing deep divisions and bitter animosity within the Shiv Sena, years after its dramatic split.

Raut's powerful response not only defends his and Uddhav Thackeray's honor but also serves as a potent reminder of the emotional stakes involved in the struggle for Bal Thackeray's true political inheritors. The Shiv Sena (UBT) maintains that Kadam's statements are nothing more than a desperate attempt to gain political mileage by disrespecting the revered founder and distorting historical facts.