UFC Vegas 84 video: Nikolas Motta upsets Tom Nolan with blistering 63 second knockout
Share- Nishadil
- January 14, 2024
- 0 Comments
- 1 minutes read
- 33 Views

Nikolas Motta didn’t care about the odds in his fight against highly touted prospect Tom Nolan . He delivered a stunning 63 second knockout to pull off the upset at UFC Vegas 84 . Coming off a disappointing no contest in his previous outing, Motta had something to prove on Saturday night. He backed that up by trading strike for strike with the 6 foot 3 Nolan, who set foot in the octagon with an undefeated record and four finishes in a row, including his appearance on the promotion’s Contender Series .
None of that mattered mattered much to Motta, as he countered Nolan at every turn until blasting the Australian with a perfectly timed counter right hand that dropped him to the canvas in a heap. Motta followed Nolan to the ground, where he continued hammering away with shots until the referee had no choice but the stop the contest.
HEAVY shots from Nikolas Motta #UFCVegas84 pic.twitter.com/57jxTdx797 The end came at just 1:03 in the opening round. “I knew that would be a very hard fight,” Motta said afterward. “Tom Nolan, he’s a killer. I saw him in the elevator today and I said, ‘Yeah, that for sure isn’t going to be a boring fight.’ I know I have a lot of power and I work with some of the best.
It feels great.” Nolan has a reputation for fierce offensive firepower and he came out guns blazing from the first exchange. Motta did the same, and that could have been a recipe for disaster against a longer, taller opponent like Nolan. Instead, Motta cracked Nolan with some nasty kicks early before unleashing the combination that put his opponent down and out in rapid fire fashion.
It was a very impressive showing from Motta, as he gets back in the win column and simultaneously hands Nolan the first loss of his career..
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on