The Unspoken Rift: Sharad Pawar's Public Rebuke and the Future of the NCP
Share- Nishadil
- February 09, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 4 minutes read
- 6 Views
Pawar vs. Parth: A Public Spat Uncovers Deeper Cracks in the NCP
A recent public criticism by Sharad Pawar of his grand-nephew Parth Pawar has brought family and political tensions within the Nationalist Congress Party into sharp focus, revealing potential fault lines and raising questions about succession.
You know, sometimes, even the most seasoned political families can't keep their internal disagreements completely under wraps. Such was the case recently, when the seasoned political titan, Sharad Pawar, didn't just hint at a disapproval, but rather quite openly and bluntly called his grand-nephew, Parth Pawar, 'immature.' It was a moment that certainly made many a political observer sit up and take notice, highlighting a palpable tension within Maharashtra’s Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) that had perhaps been brewing for a while.
What exactly triggered this rather public parental-like reprimand, you might wonder? Well, Parth, the son of Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, had taken it upon himself to advocate for a CBI inquiry into the tragic death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput. He even went so far as to meet the state home minister, Anil Deshmukh, pressing the issue. While the actor's passing had certainly gripped the nation's attention, and a CBI probe was a popular demand in certain quarters, it seems Sharad Pawar saw this move as something more than just a young politician expressing concern.
Pawar senior, never one to mince words when it truly matters, articulated his displeasure quite directly. 'Parth is immature,' he reportedly stated, adding rather dismissively, 'I do not give even an iota of importance to his statements.' Ouch. That’s a strong statement, especially coming from the patriarch of the family and the party's undisputed leader. It wasn't just a difference of opinion; it felt like a complete public disavowal of Parth’s political judgment.
Now, what makes this whole situation even more intriguing, and perhaps a tad awkward, is the conspicuous silence of Ajit Pawar, Parth's father. As the Deputy CM and a prominent figure himself, one might expect some form of parental defense or even a clarification. Yet, nothing. His quiet stance in the face of his son’s public dressing down has only fueled speculation, prompting whispers about the underlying dynamics within the Pawar clan. Is it a sign of respectful deference to the patriarch, or something else entirely?
This isn't, of course, Parth's first rodeo, nor his first brush with public scrutiny. He had previously contested the Maval Lok Sabha seat back in 2019, an election he ultimately lost quite significantly. That defeat, it seems, was also a point of contention within the family, with reports suggesting Sharad Pawar had actually preferred another candidate for the seat, feeling Parth wasn't quite ready for the big stage. You can almost feel the weight of those past expectations, can’t you, hovering over this latest episode?
Beyond the immediate family drama, this whole saga undeniably casts a long shadow over the future trajectory of the NCP itself. It forces us to ask: what does this mean for succession within the party? Is it a clear signal that Sharad Pawar still calls the shots, leaving little room for independent political maneuvering by younger members, especially if it deviates from the party line? The incident, some argue, clearly highlights the internal fissures, particularly concerning who will eventually wear the mantle of leadership.
So, while it might seem like a mere family squabble on the surface, this public exchange between Sharad Pawar and Parth is far more than that. It’s a powerful testament to the intricate, often challenging, interplay of family, politics, and power in Maharashtra. It’s a reminder that even in seemingly stable political dynasties, the path to leadership is rarely smooth, and sometimes, a few public words can speak volumes about the battles fought behind closed doors.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on