The OnePlus 12 Durability Paradox: Strong Glass, Softer Frame – What It Means for You
Share- Nishadil
- November 23, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 4 minutes read
- 2 Views
When a new flagship smartphone hits the market, one of the first things many of us wonder (after the specs, of course!) is "just how tough is it?" We spend a pretty penny on these devices, so we naturally want them to withstand the bumps and scrapes of daily life. This very question is what the renowned durability tester, JerryRigEverything, sets out to answer with every new release, and his latest target was the much-anticipated OnePlus 12.
Zack Nelson, the man behind JerryRigEverything, put the OnePlus 12 through its paces with his signature series of torture tests – scratching, burning, and bending. And, to be fair, the OnePlus 12 holds up quite well in many respects. It doesn't snap in half during the bend test, which is always a relief, suggesting a solid internal structure and good build quality overall. It seems OnePlus has learned its lessons from past models and delivered a structurally sound device.
However, an interesting, perhaps even perplexing, detail emerged from the scratch tests. The OnePlus 12 proudly features Corning's Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on its display, a material known for its impressive resistance to scratches, typically succumbing at a Mohs hardness level of 7. And indeed, the screen performed as expected, shrugging off scratches until that critical level.
Here's where things get a bit curious, and honestly, a little concerning. The phone's aluminum frame, which beautifully wraps around that super-tough screen, started showing visible scratches at a much lower Mohs hardness level – a mere 6. Think about that for a second: the protective frame is softer and more prone to scratching than the very glass it's meant to protect. It’s an intriguing paradox, isn't it?
This creates a peculiar dilemma for potential owners. In a real-world scenario, if your OnePlus 12 takes a tumble or gets scraped against a rough surface, the frame is highly likely to bear the brunt of the initial impact, picking up scratches and dents relatively easily. While this might sound like a minor aesthetic concern, it's not just about how your phone looks. A heavily scuffed or dented frame could, in certain unlucky circumstances, transfer pressure unevenly to the strong but rigid display glass, potentially compromising its integrity or even leading to a crack further down the line, despite the glass itself being incredibly tough.
So, in essence, customers might face a trade-off. Do you prefer a phone where the frame scratches easily, potentially cushioning the blow to the screen but looking a bit rough around the edges? Or would you rather have a more resilient frame, even if it meant the screen might be the first to show damage in a different scenario? It's not a clear-cut answer, and it really highlights the complex engineering decisions behind smartphone design. It feels like we're choosing between two different kinds of "ouch."
Beyond the durability debate, JerryRigEverything also performed a teardown, offering a peek inside the OnePlus 12. And here, the news is generally positive for repairability. The back glass is relatively easy to remove, standard Phillips head screws are used throughout, and common components like the battery and USB-C port appear to be quite accessible for replacement. This is definitely a win for those who value the ability to fix their devices rather than replace them entirely.
Ultimately, the OnePlus 12 presents a fascinating case study in modern smartphone durability. While it’s robust enough to survive major bending stresses, the juxtaposition of its ultra-tough screen glass with a softer, more scratch-prone aluminum frame leaves us with a unique set of considerations. It's a device that asks you to ponder: in the battle against everyday wear and tear, what kind of damage are you more willing to live with?
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on