SHC Declares: 'We Can't Be Held Hostage!' - Court's Fury Erupts Over Chaotic Degree Case

The Sindh High Court (SHC) recently expressed profound exasperation, declaring unequivocally that it "cannot be held hostage" by chaotic proceedings that have plagued a petition challenging Justice Amjad Ali Jahangiri's academic degree. The court’s frustration reached a boiling point during the latest hearing, which descended into a series of interruptions and delays, reflecting the ongoing struggle to bring the case to a just and timely conclusion.

A division bench, comprising Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, found itself in a difficult position as the petitioner, an advocate named Khawaja Shamsul Islam, repeatedly obstructed the court's efforts to proceed.

The court had initially scheduled a short adjournment to allow the petitioner to present his arguments regarding the maintainability of his plea. However, the proceedings quickly devolved into a contentious back-and-forth.

Justice Abbasi pointedly asked the petitioner if he truly wished for the court to hear his arguments.

When the petitioner responded affirmatively, the judge, with evident irritation, remarked that it appeared the petitioner was making every effort to prevent the case from being heard at all. This sentiment underscores the court's growing weariness with the procedural hurdles and the perceived tactics designed to stall progress.

The root of the matter lies in a petition filed by Shamsul Islam, who claims that Justice Jahangiri's law degree is 'fake' and alleges that the judge was initially appointed as an additional judge to the SHC based on a fabricated degree.

This serious accusation has put the spotlight on the integrity of judicial appointments and the verification process for qualifications.

During the tumultuous hearing, the petitioner frequently interrupted both the judges and the counsel representing Justice Jahangiri, Advocate Khalid Javed Khan.

He even attempted to disrupt the court's official stenographer, instructing them to record his unbidden remarks. This erratic behavior prompted a stern rebuke from Justice Abbasi, who firmly stated, “We cannot be held hostage by you.” The judge also directed the stenographer to record only the court's proceedings, not the petitioner’s disruptive interjections.

Adding to the tension, the petitioner launched personal attacks against Advocate Khalid Javed Khan, accusing him of misrepresenting facts.

This prompted Justice Abbasi to intervene, reminding the petitioner that such remarks were inappropriate and that his counsel was present to represent Justice Jahangiri, not to engage in personal disputes. The court clarified that Advocate Khan was merely performing his professional duty.

In a previous hearing, the petitioner had faced similar admonishments for causing disruptions.

Justice Khan had then warned him to maintain proper decorum, emphasizing that the court was not obligated to listen to disrespectful conduct. The bench had also cautioned the petitioner against making scandalous remarks and had ordered him to submit an apology for his past behavior.

Despite these warnings, the latest hearing saw a continuation of the same pattern.

Faced with the petitioner's persistent interruptions and refusal to cooperate, the division bench eventually adjourned the proceedings until July 9. The court also made it clear that if the petitioner continues to disrupt, appropriate action will be taken to ensure the decorum and sanctity of the judicial process are maintained.

This ongoing saga highlights the challenges faced by the judiciary when confronted with unruly litigants and the critical importance of maintaining court order to ensure justice is served efficiently and fairly.

The SHC's firm stance underscores its commitment to upholding its authority and ensuring that no individual can impede the course of justice.