Delhi | 25°C (windy)

RRB Group D CBT Shift 1: A Deep Dive into the Exam Experience

  • Nishadil
  • November 27, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 4 minutes read
  • 2 Views
RRB Group D CBT Shift 1: A Deep Dive into the Exam Experience

The air was thick with anticipation as aspirants across the country settled in for the first shift of the RRB Group D Computer Based Test (CBT). After months, perhaps even years, of dedicated preparation, this was their moment. And as the clock finally ticked down and candidates emerged from the exam halls, a collective sentiment began to echo: the paper, overall, felt surprisingly approachable – landing squarely in the easy to moderate category.

It's always a bit of a relief when the initial feedback isn't one of outright panic, isn't it? This shift, which concluded smoothly, has certainly offered some valuable insights for those yet to sit for their turn. Let's peel back the layers and take a closer look at what candidates encountered in each section, giving you a clearer picture of the challenge that was.

Diving into the General Science section, candidates found themselves tackling a sensible mix of questions primarily from Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. We're talking about fundamental concepts here – the kind you’d expect. No tricky numerical problems seemed to dominate, which often puts aspirants at ease. If you had a solid grasp of your basic scientific principles, you likely navigated this section without too much head-scratching. It largely felt quite straightforward, aligning perfectly with the 'easy' end of our spectrum.

Moving onto Mathematics, the paper presented a fair array of topics. Aspirants reported seeing a healthy spread from Simplification, Algebra, Geometry, and Mensuration to familiar favourites like Time & Work, Speed & Distance, Profit & Loss, and Percentage. Data Interpretation questions also made an appearance. While some questions demanded a bit of calculation, they weren't overly convoluted or time-consuming. Practiced candidates with a good command of formulas and problem-solving techniques would have found this section manageable, certainly on the moderate side but not excessively demanding.

The General Intelligence & Reasoning segment, often a critical decider, proved to be quite balanced. Questions touched upon familiar patterns such as Syllogism, Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding, and Series. Puzzles were present but didn't seem to be designed as major time sinks. Interestingly, some questions required careful reading and logical deduction, but they weren't inherently complex. This section tested analytical thinking rather than sheer memory, and those who practiced diligently would have found it quite scoring, comfortably fitting the easy to moderate bracket.

Finally, we have General Awareness & Current Affairs. This is always the wildcard, isn't it? The questions here spanned a broad canvas, covering aspects of Static GK, recent national and international events, awards, sports, and government schemes. As expected, a good portion of the current affairs related to the last 6-8 months, emphasizing the importance of staying updated. While some questions might have felt obscure to a few, the general consensus was that a well-rounded preparation in general knowledge would have yielded decent attempts. It’s always a mixed bag here, making it lean towards moderate simply due to the vastness of the syllabus.

So, what's the overall takeaway? The RRB Group D CBT Shift 1 paper certainly didn't aim to stump candidates with unexpected difficulty. With an overall assessment pointing firmly to an easy to moderate level, a good attempt would realistically fall somewhere in the range of 70-78 questions for general category candidates. Of course, this is an estimate, and accuracy plays a massive role. But for those who approached the exam with a calm mind and a strong foundation, there's certainly reason to feel optimistic. Best of luck to everyone still preparing – you've got this!

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on