Legal Thunderclap: Judge Clears Avangrid in Eight-Year Battle Over Maine's $1.5 Billion Power Line Project

A federal judge in Springfield, Massachusetts, has delivered a seismic ruling in one of New England's most contentious and protracted energy disputes, dismissing critical antitrust claims against Avangrid. This decision marks a pivotal moment in the eight-year legal and political saga surrounding the ambitious $1.5 billion New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC) power line project, designed to funnel hydropower from Quebec into the hungry New England grid.

U.S.

District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni sided with Avangrid, a U.S. subsidiary of Spanish energy giant Iberdrola, effectively tossing out allegations that the company engaged in anti-competitive practices to secure the lucrative contract. The lawsuit, spearheaded by rival energy giants NextEra Energy and its subsidiaries, along with other power generators, accused Avangrid of using its market position to gain an unfair advantage in the bidding process for the transmission line that promises to deliver 1,200 megawatts of Canadian hydropower.

The plaintiffs had painted a picture of a rigged game, alleging Avangrid's affiliates in Maine, Central Maine Power (CMP) and Maine Natural Gas, conspired to ensure NECEC's approval.

They claimed Avangrid manipulated the regulatory process to undermine competing projects, thereby solidifying its monopoly over the transmission of clean energy from Canada. Such allegations, if proven, could have reshaped the competitive landscape of New England's energy market.

However, Judge Mastroianni's extensive 73-page ruling meticulously dismantled these arguments.

He concluded that the plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence that Avangrid possessed the necessary market power to engage in anti-competitive harm. Crucially, he found no concrete proof that the alleged schemes actually impeded other companies from competing fairly or caused direct harm to the broader energy market.

The judge emphasized that the plaintiffs' theories of anti-competitive behavior, while detailed, ultimately lacked the factual grounding required for a successful antitrust claim.

This legal victory comes as a major relief for Avangrid, which has poured immense resources into defending the NECEC project against a relentless barrage of opposition.

The power line, a 146-mile stretch intended to traverse a portion of Maine's vast wilderness, has been mired in environmental, political, and legal battles since its inception. From citizen referendums attempting to revoke its permits to multiple lawsuits challenging its environmental impact and economic viability, the project has faced an uphill climb at every turn.

Despite this significant legal win, the path forward for the NECEC project remains shrouded in uncertainty.

Construction on the line has been paused since late 2021, following a statewide referendum in Maine that saw voters reject the project, a decision subsequently upheld by a lower court. While Avangrid has appealed this ruling to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, the future of the physical construction remains contingent on these ongoing legal challenges.

The company had initially aimed for the project to be operational by 2023, a target now significantly delayed.

The dismissal of the antitrust claims removes a substantial legal obstacle, clearing Avangrid's name regarding allegations of anti-competitive conduct. Yet, the project's fate still hangs in the balance, a testament to the complex interplay of economic interests, environmental concerns, and local sentiment that defines large-scale infrastructure development in the modern era.

This ruling, while a decisive win in the courtroom, signals a new phase in the saga, but not necessarily the final chapter.