Judicial Spotlight: Bombay High Court Steps In After Censor Board Snubs Yogi Adityanath Biopic

In a rare and significant move that underscores the ongoing tussle between artistic freedom and regulatory oversight, the Bombay High Court has decided to personally view the film "Zindagi Amrit Hai." This intervention comes after the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) outright refused to grant a certificate for the movie, which is reported to depict the life of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, Yogi Adityanath.

The decision by a division bench comprising Justices GS Kulkarni and Firdosh Pooniwalla to screen the film in their chambers highlights the gravity of the dispute.

The filmmakers, Bhagwati Prasad Films, had approached the High Court challenging the CBFC's stringent stance, arguing that their fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression was being unlawfully curtailed.

The Central Board of Film Certification initially denied the certificate, citing substantial concerns about the film's potential to impact public order and national interest.

This position was further cemented by its Revising Committee, which also upheld the denial. The CBFC's assessment was particularly influenced by the film's portrayal of a "serving public figure" – a classification that often invites increased scrutiny due to the immediate implications on public perception and political discourse.

According to the CBFC, the film contained elements that could potentially create a "law and order situation." While the Revising Committee had suggested certain modifications, including changes to the title, the addition of specific disclaimers, and even a reduction in the film's run-time, these recommendations ultimately did not lead to certification.

The Board remained firm in its decision to withhold approval, emphasizing the broader public interest and the need to prevent any adverse societal impact.

Earlier in the proceedings, the Bombay High Court had suggested to the CBFC that it might reconsider its decision. However, the Board, after due deliberation, reiterated its refusal.

This steadfast denial paved the way for the filmmakers' direct appeal to the High Court, pushing the judiciary into a unique role as arbiter of artistic content.

The upcoming private screening by the High Court is a critical juncture. It will allow the judges to directly assess the content, context, and potential implications of "Zindagi Amrit Hai" firsthand, moving beyond the arguments presented by both sides.

This move could set a precedent for future cases involving film censorship, especially when films touch upon sensitive political or biographical subjects.

Scheduled for its next hearing on June 24, this legal saga continues to captivate observers, raising pertinent questions about the delicate balance between creative expression and the responsibilities of a public censor.

The High Court's ultimate ruling will undoubtedly be keenly watched for its ramifications on India's cinematic landscape and the contours of its freedom of speech.