How to decode the Iowa caucuses result

The question of who will win the Iowa caucuses isn’t as simple as who comes in first place. “Winning” Iowa doesn’t get you much except bragging rights and an insignificant number of delegates. The true importance of the contest is in how it can shape the perceptions of the political world — , donors, activists, politicians, and voters — of who can win.

So the candidates’ true goal is to exceed the expectations the political world has for their Iowa performance. Which means the results will need a bit of decoding. For instance, if wins but his vote share or margin of victory is unexpectedly small, this will be covered as a shocking development that throws his seeming inevitability into question.

And a bad result in Iowa might not impact ’s campaign much, but such a result for would all but doom his hopes of defeating Trump. Here’s what each candidate needs. Expectations for Trump are for a huge win Most political indicators currently suggest Trump will win the GOP nomination easily, and that the first step toward this will be a big win in Iowa.

Polls of Iowa Republicans about 50 percent support, more than 30 points ahead of any other competitor. That’s where his expectations are set. If Trump ends up doing about that well, or even better, it will confirm the political world’s belief that he’s the overwhelming favorite. The flipside is that if Trump underperforms polls — getting around 40 percent or lower, or having another contender come surprisingly close to him — he will be deemed a “loser” of Iowa even though he won because the results showed his support looking less rock solid than expected.

Much chatter would then ensue about whether he is more vulnerable than commonly believed. An actual Trump in Iowa currently seems so unlikely that, if it happens, it would make the political cognoscenti question everything they think they know about this race. Still, even a shocking Iowa defeat wouldn’t doom Trump’s campaign.

He currently leads in every other state too. Iowa is understood to be kind of a quirky contest; weird things can happen there. And back during the 2016 nomination contest, Trump actually lost Iowa but went on to win anyway. Expectations for Nikki Haley in Iowa are low Haley, by contrast, has some upside in Iowa, but the consequences for a bad performance there may not be so awful to her.

That’s in part because Haley has been generally viewed as on the rise (even though her remains quite weak). But it’s mainly because Haley has prioritized the next contest — New Hampshire’s primary on January 23 — over Iowa. She has about this, telling a New Hampshire town hall that their crowd would “correct” Iowa’s result.

Iowa’s conservative base and the heavy influence evangelical activists have there aren’t a great fit for Haley, who is running as more of a traditional establishment Republican. All last year, Haley third in Iowa behind DeSantis, and most recent polls show her about tied with him (though one to second).

In Iowa, Haley trails Trump by 35 points in polls. But in New Hampshire, she’s 14 points behind Trump, . The Granite State is clearly a more promising opportunity for her. And its voters are famous for thumbing their noses at Iowa’s picks, meaning they might not hold a bad Iowa performance against Haley.

The low expectations for Haley in Iowa even make it possible that, if she comes in a strong second place (ahead of DeSantis and closer than expected to Trump), she could be deemed the “real” winner by many in the political world. But either way, it’s New Hampshire that will determine whether Haley’s campaign is for real.

Ron DeSantis needs to do really well to show his campaign has a pulse Because DeSantis’s campaign is so widely viewed as doomed, he needs a dramatic success in Iowa to alter those perceptions and justify staying in the race. After spending much of the past year and , DeSantis has bet everything on Iowa as his best shot for a comeback.

He has the endorsement of the state’s governor and has spent years cultivating right wing activists. But he’s spent most of the past year a distant second to Trump in , and the most recent polls show him and Haley — who, again, hasn’t prioritized the state — neck and neck. And, unlike Haley, he doesn’t have a more promising opportunity coming up: DeSantis is polling at an awful 6.5 percent in .

To revitalize his chances in the race, DeSantis really needs to over perform in Iowa. A distant second place edging out Haley likely wouldn’t be good enough. Perhaps a strong second, much closer than expected to Trump, would do the trick. Anything short of that would likely mean curtains for him, since he’d lose his last remaining support from GOP donors.

Vivek Ramaswamy needs to prove he’s a real candidate As for , he’s more of a wild card. After a brief burst of attention several months ago, media and GOP voter attention have largely moved on from the former biotech CEO, who’s been stuck at single digits in polls nationally and in all the early states.

Polls do show Ramaswamy doing slightly better in Iowa (where he averages 6.5 percent) than in other early states (where he averages 3 to 5 percent). And he has been , visiting each of the state’s 99 counties twice. If he has a hardcore base of intense supporters who are disproportionately likely to turn out, the low turnout caucuses could be an opportunity to punch above his weight.

Conversely, an unimpressive performance in Iowa would likely suggest Ramaswamy won’t do too well anywhere else, either. Single digits are not enough anymore. Ramaswamy has tried to set an achievable expectation by saying he hopes to finish at least third in Iowa, but that would likely not be enough to make him a serious contender, given his lack of prospects in other early states.

Ramaswamy is largely self funding his campaign and could theoretically stay in as long as he wants since donors won’t be able to force his hand by stopping payment of his staffers’ salaries. But anything other than an extraordinary overperformance in Iowa would result in him being written off by the political world..