Zepto's Quick Commerce Conundrum: Is It Leading or Lagging?
Share- Nishadil
- November 27, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 4 minutes read
- 1 Views
Ah, the world of quick commerce – it's a whirlwind, isn't it? One moment you're soaring, the next you're fighting tooth and nail for every scrap of market share. And right now, the spotlight is firmly on Zepto, a key player in India's rapid grocery delivery scene. But here's the kicker: the financial bigwigs can't quite agree on whether Zepto is leading the pack or, well, perhaps losing a bit of its stride. It's a classic tale, isn't it, two seemingly authoritative voices painting wildly different pictures.
On one side, we have HSBC, and frankly, their assessment sounds quite rosy. They've dubbed Zepto a "category leader," which is no small compliment in such a competitive arena. According to their numbers from March 2023, Zepto held a respectable 30% of the market share. What's more, they projected an impressive Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) run-rate of approximately $1.2 billion. That's a lot of groceries, delivered in a flash! HSBC also highlighted Zepto's impressive 10 million monthly transacting users (MTUs) and pointed out that while their average order value might be a tad lower, customers are making purchases far more frequently. All signs, they suggested, pointed towards a clear path to profitability for the startup, which, let's be honest, is music to any investor's ears in this capital-intensive business.
However, and this is where the plot thickens, Bank of America (BofA) offers a rather contrasting narrative. Their report, delving into data up to January 2024, paints a picture where Zepto isn't just holding its own, but actually ceding ground, particularly to Zomato's Blinkit. BofA's figures suggest Blinkit now commands a hefty 46% of the quick commerce GMV, leaving Zepto and Swiggy Instamart tied at a significantly lower 27% each. That's quite a swing from HSBC's earlier optimism, isn't it? It makes you wonder what changed, or perhaps, what different methodologies were used.
Beyond market share, BofA also raised an eyebrow at Zepto's reported number of dark stores – those crucial micro-warehouses that make rapid delivery possible. While Zepto has often spoken of having around 1,000 dark stores, BofA's analysis implied the actual operational count might be considerably lower, closer to 280-350. Now, that's a bit of a head-scratcher because a robust network of dark stores is fundamental to quick commerce efficiency and reach. Fewer dark stores could certainly explain a potential dip in market dominance, impacting delivery times and geographical coverage.
In this high-stakes game, Zepto recently managed to secure a significant $200 million in funding, pushing its valuation to a healthy $1.4 billion. This financial boost undoubtedly provides some breathing room and the firepower needed to navigate such a cutthroat market. And internally, Zepto is clearly focused on achieving EBITDA positivity by March 2025 – a critical milestone for any high-growth startup. But with such disparate views from major financial institutions, the road ahead seems less like a smooth highway and more like a winding mountain path, full of twists and turns.
So, where does that leave us, the curious observers? Well, it leaves us with more questions than answers, doesn't it? Is Zepto truly the leader, or is it facing an uphill battle against formidable rivals like Blinkit and Swiggy Instamart? The quick commerce landscape in India is undeniably dynamic, evolving at a breakneck pace. Perhaps both reports capture a truth, just at different moments in time, or from slightly different vantage points. One thing's for sure: all eyes will remain on Zepto as it strives to solidify its position and hit those ambitious profitability targets. It's a saga worth following, that's for sure.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on