Wilmot Council Grapples with the Divisive Future and Staggering Costs of the Prime Ministers' Path
Share- Nishadil
- August 27, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 6 Views

The Township of Wilmot finds itself once again at a crossroads, entangled in a contentious debate surrounding the fate and significant financial implications of its 'Prime Ministers' Path' project. After a period of public and political upheaval that saw the removal of the controversial statues last year, Wilmot Council is now meticulously reviewing the substantial costs associated with their potential reinstallation.
The saga began with the removal of the twelve statues, initially conceived by former mayor Les Armstrong, which depicted Canadian Prime Ministers.
This decision came amidst a wave of public outcry and a formal motion passed by council, prompted by concerns ranging from historical accuracy to the appropriateness of celebrating certain figures. The initial cost to remove these statues from their original location in Baden was a staggering $200,000, a figure that continues to loom large in the minds of taxpayers.
Now, the discussion has shifted to bringing them back, albeit under new terms.
During a recent council meeting, staff presented various options and their corresponding price tags. Reinstalling the statues at their previous site in Baden is projected to cost between $72,000 and $108,000. This estimate covers the necessary infrastructure work, landscaping, and the careful re-placement of each figure.
However, a significant portion of this cost—approximately $30,000—is attributed to the installation of concrete pads to protect the statues from potential vandalism and allow for easier removal in the future, a direct lesson learned from their controversial past.
Adding another layer of complexity to the debate is the proposed alternative of relocating the Prime Ministers' Path.
Staff suggested a new location in New Hamburg, which is generally considered more accessible and centralized within the township. While this option might offer a fresh start and broader public engagement, it introduces additional costs. If moved to New Hamburg, the project would necessitate an extra $30,000 for the construction of new concrete pads at the chosen site, increasing the overall expenditure.
The public sentiment surrounding the statues remains as divided as ever.
A considerable number of residents are advocating for the return of the path, viewing it as an important artistic and historical asset to the community. Petitions have circulated, reflecting a desire to see the figures reinstated. Conversely, an equally vocal contingent believes the statues should remain removed permanently, or even be sold off, arguing that the public funds could be better allocated to other community projects and that the figures themselves are no longer representative of the township's values.
Council members are navigating this intricate issue, acknowledging the deep divisions within the community.
The debate extends beyond mere finances, touching upon questions of historical representation, public art's role, and the efficient use of taxpayer money. They are tasked with finding a "path forward" that respects diverse viewpoints while ensuring fiscal responsibility. Potential outcomes range from full reinstallation at either Baden or New Hamburg, to a decision for permanent removal, or even exploring options for selling the statues to interested parties.
As Wilmot Council continues its deliberations, residents eagerly await a definitive resolution.
The decision, expected in the coming weeks, will undoubtedly have a lasting impact on the township's landscape, its public art policy, and its community spirit. The 'Prime Ministers' Path' has proven to be more than just a collection of statues; it's a mirror reflecting the complex values and priorities of a community striving to define its identity.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on