When Bets Go Bad: How Leveraged Crypto ETFs Were Pummeled in the Recent Market Tumble
Share- Nishadil
- December 03, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 5 Views
Oh, what a roller coaster ride the crypto market has been, especially lately! When Bitcoin and Ether started their dizzying descent earlier this year, it wasn't just the direct holders feeling the pinch. Certain specialized investment vehicles, designed to amplify returns – or losses, as it tragically turned out – found themselves utterly battered, pushing investor caution to the forefront.
Among the hardest hit were Strategy's leveraged ETFs, specifically BITI and BNBT. These aren't your typical 'buy and hold' crypto funds; far from it. BITI, for instance, was set up to essentially bet against Bitcoin's daily movements, tracking the inverse performance of Bitcoin futures. Similarly, BNBT aimed to do the same for Ether futures. The idea, in theory, is to profit when the underlying asset goes down. Sounds clever, right? But the devil, as they say, is in the details – and in the volatility of the crypto market.
And boy, did they get hit. The numbers are truly eye-watering. In April alone, BITI plummeted by a staggering 67%. May wasn't much kinder, with another 48% wiped off its value. BNBT, the Ether counterpart, fared little better, suffering a 60% drop in April and a further 54% loss in May. These aren't just minor dips; these are catastrophic events for anyone holding these funds.
The pain wasn't confined to just these two leveraged products. Strategy's overall assets under management (AUM) for its suite of ETFs took a massive hit, tumbling from around $300 million down to a mere $118 million by late May. Even their more straightforward spot crypto ETF, BTCC, which directly tracks the price of Bitcoin, saw its AUM shrink dramatically from $1.6 billion to about $700 million. It’s a stark reminder that even the less aggressive funds aren’t immune when the entire market goes south.
So, what triggered this brutal downturn? Well, it was a perfect storm, really. May saw the spectacular collapse of TerraUSD, a stablecoin that lost its peg, sending shockwaves through the entire crypto ecosystem. Add to that the U.S. Federal Reserve's aggressive interest rate hikes and escalating inflation fears, and you had a recipe for disaster. Bitcoin, the king of cryptocurrencies, plunged to 16-month lows, dragging pretty much everything else with it.
Let's be brutally honest here: leveraged ETFs are notoriously risky instruments, even in stable markets. They're designed to amplify returns (and losses) and are typically meant for short-term, sophisticated trading, not long-term investment. Analysts have long warned about the dangers of these products, especially for retail investors who might not fully grasp the mechanics or the potential for rapid, outsized losses in highly volatile markets like cryptocurrency. This episode serves as a powerful, albeit painful, lesson about the inherent risks of chasing amplified gains with such instruments.
- India
- Pakistan
- Business
- News
- BusinessNews
- SaudiArabia
- Singapore
- China
- Israel
- Myanmar
- NorthKorea
- Taiwan
- Japan
- SriLanka
- Bitcoin
- SouthKorea
- Bhutan
- Iran
- Qatar
- Georgia
- Iraq
- Malaysia
- Macau
- Turkey
- Indonesia
- Yemen
- Jordan
- Maldives
- TimorLeste
- HongKong
- Syria
- Afghanistan
- Kuwait
- Cyprus
- Kazakhstan
- AssetManagement
- UnitedArabEmirates
- Lebanon
- Kyrgyzstan
- Armenia
- Azerbaijan
- Oman
- Uzbekistan
- Turkmenistan
- Bahrain
- Tajikistan
- Nepal
- InvestmentRisk
- CryptocurrencyMarket
- Bangladesh
- Thailand
- Mongolia
- Brunei
- Philippines
- Laos
- Vietnam
- Cambodia
- LeveragedEtfs
- VolatileMarket
- Ether
- MarketSlump
- StrategyEtfs
- InverseFunds
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on