Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Vande Bharat Sleeper Trains: A Culinary Conundrum Sparks National Debate

  • Nishadil
  • January 26, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 2 Views
Vande Bharat Sleeper Trains: A Culinary Conundrum Sparks National Debate

Veg-Only Menu on Vande Bharat Sleepers: Is India Ready for a Single-Plate Approach?

Indian Railways' decision to offer an exclusively vegetarian menu on the upcoming Vande Bharat sleeper trains has ignited a fiery political row between the TMC and BJP, alongside significant passenger concerns, questioning dietary choice and cultural representation on India's premium rail service.

Well, isn't this something? Just as we're all looking forward to the next evolution in Indian rail travel – the snazzy new Vande Bharat sleeper trains – a rather spicy controversy has cooked up around their proposed menu. And when I say "spicy," I don't mean with chili; I mean politically charged, and quite a few passengers are raising an eyebrow, or two!

The whole kerfuffle revolves around a single, seemingly simple decision by Indian Railways: the upcoming Vande Bharat sleeper service will reportedly offer an exclusively vegetarian menu. Now, for some, that might sound perfectly fine. But in a country as incredibly diverse as India, where culinary traditions are as varied as its languages, this "veg-only" approach has quickly turned into a full-blown political food fight.

Leading the charge against this decision is the Trinamool Congress (TMC), who haven't held back in their criticism. They're seeing red, quite literally, accusing the move of being an act of "saffronisation" – a not-so-subtle attempt to push a particular ideological agenda onto public services. Mahua Moitra, a prominent TMC MP, didn't mince words, calling it an imposition on a diverse populace and questioning the very secular fabric of the nation. It's not just about what's on the plate, she implies; it's about what it represents.

The BJP, naturally, is quick to defend the railways' stance. They argue that passengers always have the option to bring their own food, a point often made in these discussions. Union Minister Darshana Jardosh, for instance, highlighted that many people actually prefer vegetarian meals, suggesting this decision might cater to a broad segment of travelers. Plus, she hints, perhaps it simplifies operations? One less thing to worry about in the galley, maybe?

But let's be honest, this isn't the first time Vande Bharat's food service has been under the scanner. Even on the existing chair car versions, which primarily offer quick-service meals, passengers have often voiced complaints about the limited options, frequently finding themselves stuck with paneer dishes. While paneer is delicious, it’s fair to say that a long overnight journey on a premium train might warrant a bit more variety, or at least the choice of variety, wouldn't you agree?

Think about it: these sleeper trains are designed for long-distance, overnight travel. Passengers will be spending many hours on board. The idea of being restricted to only vegetarian options for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, over an extended period, does raise practical questions for a significant portion of India's non-vegetarian population. It’s not just about convenience; for many, food is a cultural experience, an expectation tied to travel itself.

So, is this a genuinely passenger-centric move, catering to a perceived demand for vegetarian food, or is it, as the opposition suggests, a more ideologically driven decision? The debate goes much deeper than just the ingredients in a meal. It touches upon issues of individual choice, India's constitutional secularism, and the very perception of public services in a diverse society. Whatever the intention, one thing's for sure: this food fight on the Vande Bharat sleeper trains is far from over, and it's certainly got everyone talking.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on