Delhi | 25°C (windy)

U.S. and South Korea's Trade Tensions: A Stalemate Over Steel and the KORUS FTA

  • Nishadil
  • January 31, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 1 Views
U.S. and South Korea's Trade Tensions: A Stalemate Over Steel and the KORUS FTA

Trade Talks Hit a Wall: Trump's Steel Tariff Threat Stalls US-Korea Negotiations

Despite high-level meetings, US-South Korea trade talks are stuck. Washington's proposed 25% steel tariff is clashing with Seoul's demand for an exemption, intertwined with efforts to revise the critical KORUS free trade agreement.

Oh, what a tangled web we weave when it comes to international trade, wouldn't you say? Especially when you throw in hefty tariffs and critical alliances. Right now, it seems the relationship between the United States and South Korea is navigating just such a tricky patch, with trade talks hitting a rather stubborn brick wall. Despite the best efforts and multiple high-level meetings, things remain very much up in the air.

At the heart of this particular deadlock is, quite frankly, steel. Or, more specifically, President Trump's rather pointed threat to slap a 25% tariff on steel imports into the U.S. under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. For South Korea, a significant steel producer, this isn't just a minor inconvenience; it's a major concern. They're desperately—and understandably—seeking an exemption from these proposed tariffs.

But here's where it gets complicated. The U.S., through its Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, isn't just handing out exemptions freely. No, Washington sees this as an opportunity, a bit of leverage, perhaps, in its broader goal to revise the crucial US-Korea Free Trade Agreement, better known as KORUS FTA. You see, the Trump administration has been quite vocal about its belief that the existing KORUS deal isn't fair to American workers and businesses, particularly when it comes to the automotive sector. They're looking for concessions, and they're tying the steel tariff exemption directly to progress on these KORUS revisions.

South Korean Trade Minister Kim Hyun-chong, along with his delegation, has been actively engaged in these discussions, trying to navigate these choppy waters. They've met with Lighthizer and other U.S. officials, presenting their case for an exemption. After all, South Korea isn't just a trading partner; it's a long-standing ally, an important player in regional security. From their perspective, being lumped in with other steel-producing nations under a blanket tariff feels a bit, well, unfair and potentially damaging to their economy.

The core issue boils down to this: South Korea wants certainty and a tariff exemption first, viewing it as separate from the KORUS FTA discussions. The U.S., on the other hand, is firmly linking the two, essentially saying, "Show us progress on KORUS, and then we can talk about steel." This fundamental difference in approach is precisely what's causing the current stalemate. It’s like two skilled negotiators playing a very high-stakes game of chess, each waiting for the other to make a move, or perhaps, to blink first.

So, where does this leave us? For now, in a state of unresolved tension. The stalled talks mean continued uncertainty for South Korean steelmakers and for the broader trade relationship between these two important nations. It's a clear example of the "America First" trade agenda in action, putting pressure on allies to renegotiate terms that the current administration views as unbalanced. The path forward remains unclear, but one thing is certain: a resolution won't be easy, requiring significant give-and-take from both sides to find a truly mutually beneficial agreement.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on