Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Trump's Tariff Threat Looms: How India's Pharma Giants Brace for a 100% Import Duty Shake-up

  • Nishadil
  • September 27, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 12 Views
Trump's Tariff Threat Looms: How India's Pharma Giants Brace for a 100% Import Duty Shake-up

A storm is brewing on the horizon for the global pharmaceutical landscape, and India's vibrant drug manufacturing sector finds itself right in its path. Former US President Donald Trump’s audacious proposal of a 100% tariff on 'branded drugs' imported from specific nations, a cornerstone of his potential second term 'America First' agenda, has sent ripples of concern through boardrooms across India.

While India is globally renowned as the 'pharmacy of the world' largely due to its prowess in generic drug manufacturing, the immediate classification of "branded drugs" might seem to shield its primary export.

However, this superficial assessment masks a deeper, more complex reality. Indian pharmaceutical giants are not static; they are dynamically evolving, increasingly investing heavily in research and development to carve out a significant presence in the high-value segments of complex generics, biosimilars, and even some branded specialties.

This strategic pivot means the proposed tariff, despite its initial phrasing, poses a substantial and ambiguous threat.

Industry experts and executives are grappling with the lack of clarity surrounding Trump's proposal. What precisely constitutes a "branded drug" in this context? Will a biosimilar, a highly complex generic version of a biologic medicine, be categorized differently from a traditional small-molecule generic? More critically, the 'country of origin' for a pharmaceutical product is rarely straightforward.

Drugs often involve active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) sourced from multiple countries, manufactured in one, and finished in another. This intricate global supply chain makes defining origin a bureaucratic minefield, potentially leaving many Indian-made complex generics vulnerable to arbitrary classification and punitive tariffs.

The United States remains an indispensable market for India’s pharmaceutical exports, accounting for a substantial portion of its overall drug shipments.

Major Indian players like Cipla, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Lupin, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Zydus Lifesciences, and Biocon have established significant footprints in the US, with some of their most innovative and high-growth products targeting this market. A 100% tariff would not just be a deterrent; it would be an insurmountable barrier, effectively pricing these crucial products out of the US market and severely disrupting established supply chains.

The potential implications are vast.

Such a tariff could drastically increase healthcare costs for American consumers, limit access to affordable medicines, and compel Indian manufacturers to re-evaluate their strategic investments and market focus. For Indian companies, the scenario necessitates careful re-evaluation of their US-centric strategies, potentially diverting resources to other markets or re-localizing aspects of their supply chain—a costly and time-consuming endeavor.

Currently, the Indian pharmaceutical industry, through bodies like Pharmexcil, is closely monitoring the evolving political discourse in the US.

They are engaging in discussions, assessing various scenarios, and preparing to advocate for policies that recognize the globalized nature of drug manufacturing and the critical role India plays in ensuring global access to affordable, quality medicines. The sentiment is one of cautious vigilance, hoping for clarity and a policy approach that avoids unnecessary disruption to a sector vital for global health.

As the US election cycle heats up, the specter of these tariffs continues to cast a long shadow over India's pharmaceutical ambitions.

The industry is on alert, ready to adapt to whatever trade winds may blow from Washington, but undeniably hoping for a path that ensures continued collaboration and access to essential medicines, rather than punitive protectionism.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on