Trump Demands Microsoft Fire Top Executive Brad Smith, Citing 'Anti-Trump' Stance
Share- Nishadil
- September 27, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 10 Views

In a stunning move that has sent ripples through the tech and political worlds, former President Donald Trump has publicly called for Microsoft to terminate its President of Global Affairs, Brad Smith. Trump's demand, articulated on his Truth Social platform, accuses Smith of being an "anti-Trump" figure and a "Trump hater," making his continued employment a potential point of contention should Trump return to the White House.
Trump's ire stems from Smith's past actions and public statements, particularly his testimony before Congress regarding Trump's post-election conduct and his involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot investigation.
Smith has been an outspoken advocate for democracy, often commenting on the health of democratic institutions, which Trump perceives as direct criticism targeting him.
"Brad Smith, the President of Global Affairs for Microsoft, is a Trump Hater, a Radical Left Lunatic who is totally Anti-Trump," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
He further asserted that Smith's sentiments are not just personal but reflect an antagonistic stance towards his political movement. Trump's post implied that Microsoft, a major American corporation, would be ill-advised to keep such a figure in a high-ranking position, especially given the possibility of a future Trump administration.
The former president's statement marks a direct challenge to Microsoft, putting the tech giant in a precarious position.
Companies often strive to remain apolitical, or at least navigate political landscapes with extreme caution, to avoid alienating customers, governments, or potential administrations. Trump's forceful demand could force Microsoft to either defend its executive or risk facing the wrath of a potentially re-elected president.
Smith's career at Microsoft spans decades, rising through the ranks to become one of the company's most influential figures, shaping its global policy, legal, and philanthropic initiatives.
His public profile has grown significantly in recent years as he's addressed complex issues ranging from cybersecurity and data privacy to the ethical implications of artificial intelligence and the importance of democratic values.
This isn't the first time Trump has publicly targeted individuals he deems critical of him.
His history includes sharp rebukes and calls for dismissals of various figures in media, business, and politics. However, a direct demand for a private company to fire a high-level executive like Smith, explicitly tied to political loyalty, underscores the intensity of the current political climate.
Microsoft has yet to issue a public statement regarding Trump's demand.
The situation highlights the increasing pressure corporations face to navigate politically charged environments, where the actions and opinions of their top executives can become flashpoints in broader political battles. The coming days will reveal how Microsoft chooses to respond to this high-stakes political challenge, and whether it sets a new precedent for corporate leadership in an era of polarized politics.
.- India
- Pakistan
- Business
- News
- BusinessNews
- SaudiArabia
- Singapore
- DonaldTrump
- China
- Israel
- Myanmar
- NorthKorea
- Taiwan
- Japan
- SriLanka
- SouthKorea
- January6
- Bhutan
- Microsoft
- Iran
- Qatar
- Georgia
- Iraq
- Malaysia
- Macau
- Turkey
- Indonesia
- Yemen
- Jordan
- Maldives
- TimorLeste
- HongKong
- Syria
- Afghanistan
- TruthSocial
- Kuwait
- Cyprus
- Kazakhstan
- UnitedArabEmirates
- Lebanon
- Kyrgyzstan
- Armenia
- Azerbaijan
- Oman
- Uzbekistan
- Turkmenistan
- Bahrain
- Tajikistan
- Nepal
- Bangladesh
- Thailand
- Mongolia
- Brunei
- Philippines
- Laos
- Vietnam
- Cambodia
- GlobalAffairs
- BradSmith
- TechPolitics
- TrumpHater
- CorporatePressure
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on