Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The Unsettling Echoes: When Politics Meets Peril

  • Nishadil
  • November 11, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 2 Views
The Unsettling Echoes: When Politics Meets Peril

In the often-turbulent theatre of Indian politics, a new storm, quite frankly, seems perpetually on the horizon. And this time, it’s Mehbooba Mufti, the former Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, who has stepped into the fray, delivering a rather sharp rebuke to Union Minister Giriraj Singh. Her words, you see, weren't just a political counter; they were a profound query into the very timing and narratives surrounding national security incidents.

Singh, known perhaps for his outspoken—some might say provocative—style, recently posed a pair of questions that, one could argue, were designed to needle: "Who killed Indira? Who killed Gandhi?" Loaded words, indeed, especially when uttered in a climate already thick with political tension and, yes, the recent recovery of a significant amount of RDX in the Pulwama area of Jammu and Kashmir.

But Mufti, ever the astute political observer, didn’t merely react; she drew unsettling parallels. Her words painted a rather stark picture, suggesting a pattern, a rhythm, to these grave security incidents. "Whenever there is an election," she asserted, with a notable conviction, "such incidents are engineered." It's a statement that, for many, undoubtedly resonates with a certain unsettling truth.

And for context, she pointed to two seismic events in India’s recent history: the Pulwama attack and the horrific Mumbai blasts. Both, she reminded everyone, occurred under circumstances that, in hindsight, seem to converge around the electoral cycle. Coincidence? Or something more, she implicitly asked, allowing the question to hang in the air, weighty and unresolved.

It's a chilling insinuation, really, that such tragic events—those that shake a nation to its very core—might somehow be leveraged, even orchestrated, for political dividends. She wasn't just countering Singh; she was, in essence, questioning the very fabric of political ethics, the lengths to which some might go to sway public sentiment and, ultimately, votes.

So, when Giriraj Singh tosses out questions about past assassinations and Mehbooba Mufti counters with observations about the timing of terror incidents, one is left, quite honestly, pondering the deeper currents at play. It’s not just a war of words; it’s a strategic maneuver, perhaps, in the grand, often cynical, game of power, where truth and perception, sadly, often become tangled beyond recognition.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on