Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The Ultimate Step Showdown: Apple Watch 11 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra – A Clear Winner Emerges

  • Nishadil
  • October 03, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 2 Views
The Ultimate Step Showdown: Apple Watch 11 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra – A Clear Winner Emerges

In the bustling world of wearables, smartwatches have become indispensable tools for monitoring our health and activity. At the core of many fitness journeys lies the humble step count, a seemingly simple metric that can significantly impact our daily goals. But how accurate are these sophisticated devices when pushed to their limits? We pitted two titans of the smartwatch arena – the anticipated Apple Watch 11 and the robust Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra – against each other in a definitive 5,000-step challenge to uncover the true champion of step tracking precision.

The Apple Watch, renowned for its seamless integration with the iOS ecosystem and comprehensive health features, continues to evolve with each iteration, promising enhanced accuracy.

On the other side, Samsung’s 'Ultra' moniker suggests a device built for demanding users, offering rugged durability and advanced tracking capabilities. Both boast cutting-edge sensors and algorithms designed to give us the most accurate representation of our daily movement. But hype aside, real-world performance is what truly matters.

To ensure a fair and rigorous comparison, our test involved a controlled 5,000-step walk.

I wore both smartwatches simultaneously – the Apple Watch 11 on my left wrist and the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra on my right. Crucially, an independent, medically validated pedometer was also used, securely clipped to my waist, to provide a reliable baseline for accuracy. The walk took place over a consistent, flat paved route, minimizing external variables like elevation changes or uneven terrain.

My pace was steady, simulating a typical brisk walk, and I made sure to swing my arms naturally.

After completing the 5,000 steps as registered by our baseline pedometer, the results were telling. The Apple Watch 11 reported an impressive 4,985 steps, showing a mere discrepancy of 15 steps from the actual count.

This translates to an incredibly precise 99.7% accuracy rate. The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra, while certainly not poor, registered 4,890 steps, a difference of 110 steps, putting its accuracy at approximately 97.8%.

What accounts for this difference? During the walk, both devices felt comfortable and provided consistent data on their screens.

However, the Apple Watch consistently stayed closer to the pedometer’s real-time count throughout various intervals, suggesting a more refined algorithm or superior sensor calibration for this specific activity. The Galaxy Watch Ultra, while excellent for many fitness metrics, seemed to occasionally miss a step or slightly delay its count update, particularly during initial acceleration or minor changes in stride.

Accuracy is paramount, but the overall user experience also plays a role.

Both interfaces are intuitive, providing clear readouts. However, the consistent performance of the Apple Watch in this direct comparison instilled greater confidence in its step-tracking capabilities. For those who rely heavily on daily step goals for motivation or health management, even a small consistent deviation can be significant over weeks and months.

After an extensive 5,000-step head-to-head, there emerged a clear winner.

The Apple Watch 11 demonstrated superior accuracy in step tracking, proving to be the more reliable companion for diligently counting every stride. While the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra is a formidable device with many strengths, for the precise measurement of steps, the Apple Watch maintains its edge.

If maximizing the accuracy of your daily step count is a top priority, the Apple Watch 11 clearly takes the crown in this particular challenge, reaffirming its status as a leader in personal health monitoring.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on