Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The Shifting Sands of Policy: When Medical Dreams Clash with Sudden Rules

  • Nishadil
  • November 13, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 4 minutes read
  • 11 Views
The Shifting Sands of Policy: When Medical Dreams Clash with Sudden Rules

There's a palpable tension, a sense of deep unease, swirling around the future of countless aspiring doctors and dentists across Pakistan. Imagine, if you will, months – perhaps even years – of relentless study, of burning the midnight oil, all geared towards a single, pivotal exam: the MDCAT. And then, just when you think you've cleared the biggest hurdle, the rules... well, they just change. Suddenly. Without warning, or so it seems.

That's precisely the predicament a cohort of students, truly, finds themselves in, pushing them right to the doors of the Islamabad High Court (IHC). They're not just grumbling, mind you; they've lodged a formidable challenge against the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC), alleging something rather extraordinary: a sudden, baffling pivot in the MDCAT admission policy. Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, listening intently, has now issued a notice to the PMDC, along with the Secretary Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination, and even the Pakistan Medical Commission (PMC), demanding answers. And quickly, too.

What’s all the fuss about? Well, it boils down to two rather significant alterations. Firstly, the PMDC, in what some are calling an almost bewildering move, slashed the MDCAT passing marks for admission into private medical and dental colleges from a stringent 80% down to a more lenient 65%. Sounds good, right? More students could potentially get in. But here's the catch, and it’s a big one: this relaxed standard only applies to private institutions. Public colleges, for some reason, retain the higher threshold. And, honestly, this disparity immediately raises eyebrows, sparking fierce accusations of discrimination. Is this fair? You could say it feels deeply uneven, a clear violation, petitioners argue, of Article 25 of the Constitution, which champions equality for all citizens.

Then there’s the second, equally contentious change: the outright abolition of the 50% domicile quota for private medical and dental college admissions. For years, this quota ensured that local students, those from specific regions, had a fighting chance, a reserved spot in institutions within their own province. But now? Poof, it's gone. Students like Hiba Khalid, Iman Fatima, and Maryam Khawaja, among others who’ve bravely stepped forward, contend that this, too, is discriminatory. It places local aspirants at an unfair disadvantage, creating a playing field that feels anything but level. After all, isn't local representation important, especially in a field as vital as healthcare?

The core of the students’ argument is perhaps the most unsettling: these policy changes weren't just made; they were made after the MDCAT exam had already been conducted, and indeed, after the previous, well-established policy had already been published. Imagine preparing for a race, knowing the rules, running your best, and then being told at the finish line that the rules changed midway. It’s a bitter pill to swallow, frankly. The petitioners, through their counsel, haven’t held back, describing the PMDC's actions as "malafide" and a "colourable exercise of power." Strong words, yes, but perhaps indicative of the deep frustration bubbling beneath the surface.

It’s more than just a procedural quibble; it’s about the very soul of medical education in Pakistan. This sudden shift, many fear, isn't just discriminatory but could also pave the way for a troubling commercialization of medical and dental admissions, potentially undermining the rigorous meritocracy that should define such a critical profession. The court's intervention, therefore, isn't just a legal formality; it’s a beacon of hope for thousands of young people whose dreams now hang precariously in the balance. We wait, with bated breath, for the PMDC’s response, hoping that clarity, and above all, fairness, will ultimately prevail.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on