The Shadow of the Scissors: Over 720 Hours of Film Content Altered by India's Censor Board
Share- Nishadil
- September 20, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 4 Views

In the vibrant and prolific landscape of Indian cinema and television, an unseen hand meticulously shapes the content reaching audiences. A recent data analysis, compiled from Right to Information (RTI) responses, reveals the staggering extent of this intervention: a monumental over 720 hours of film and television content have been altered, cut, or modified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) between 2017 and 2023.
This isn't merely a handful of scenes edited here and there; this represents a vast ocean of creative work, equivalent to watching over 43,200 minutes of censored material.
The findings cast a spotlight on the significant role the CBFC plays in defining what India watches, touching thousands of productions across various platforms.
The data meticulously tracks 20,961 unique films and series that passed through the CBFC's scrutiny during this six-year period.
While the public eye often focuses on theatrical releases, the majority of these altered productions – a staggering 11,048 – were intended for television. Films, both feature-length and short, accounted for 8,949 instances, while content for Over-The-Top (OTT) platforms, which gained prominence during the pandemic, saw 964 alterations, despite a shift towards self-regulation for streaming services post-2021.
Drilling down into the timeline, the year 2018 stands out as an unprecedented peak in censorship activity.
During this single year, the CBFC reportedly ordered an astonishing 34,167 minutes, or approximately 569 hours, of cuts. This period saw a heightened focus on ensuring content adhered to perceived moral and cultural guidelines, often leading to extensive modifications. Following 2018, while the numbers dipped, they remained substantial, with 2019 witnessing around 2,968 minutes (approximately 49 hours) of alterations.
The pandemic years introduced new challenges and shifts in content consumption, yet the censor board's activity, though slightly reduced from its peak, continued its steady pace.
The nature of these alterations varies widely, but common reasons cited include the depiction of violence, sexual content, explicit language, and anything deemed religiously or politically sensitive. These directives often lead to content creators having to re-edit, reshoot, or even significantly alter narratives, potentially impacting the original artistic vision.
Beyond mere cuts, the CBFC's recommendations often include adding disclaimers, blurring specific scenes, or muting dialogues.
While the intention is to ensure public order and protect sensibilities, the sheer volume of these interventions raises questions about creative freedom and the evolving standards of content regulation in a rapidly changing media landscape. The process can also introduce significant delays, impacting release schedules and financial returns for producers.
This extensive data provides a crucial window into the regulatory mechanisms governing India's entertainment industry.
It underscores the immense power vested in the CBFC to shape cultural narratives and public discourse, while simultaneously prompting a deeper conversation about the balance between oversight and artistic expression in one of the world's largest film-producing nations.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on