The Sacred Scrolls: Unraveling the 'Missing Saroops' Mystery at Banga
Share- Nishadil
- January 20, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 7 Views
SGPC Lifts Cloud of Doubt: All Holy Saroops Securely Accounted For at Banga Shrine
A recent wave of concern over allegedly missing Saroops at Gurdwara Shri Charan Kanwal Sahib in Banga has been definitively allayed, following a meticulous SGPC investigation that confirmed the presence of all sacred scriptures.
For Sikhs worldwide, the Guru Granth Sahib, in its physical form known as a Saroop, isn't just a holy book; it's considered a living Guru, imbued with immense spiritual reverence. You know, its presence in a Gurdwara is the very heart of the sanctuary, guiding and inspiring millions. So, when whispers, and then outright allegations, surfaced about sacred Saroops going missing from the historic Gurdwara Shri Charan Kanwal Sahib in Banga, it sent, quite understandably, a profound tremor through the community. This isn't merely a bureaucratic hiccup; it's a deeply emotional and spiritual issue, touching the core beliefs of a faith.
The genesis of this recent unrest came from Bhai Kulwinder Singh, a former granthi (religious officiant) at the shrine. He made some pretty serious claims, alleging that as many as twenty-seven Saroops had mysteriously disappeared. It painted a picture of grave neglect, or worse, outright theft, of these sacred scriptures, something that understandably sent ripples of concern through the Sikh community. Such an accusation, especially given the ongoing sensitivities around similar issues in the past, demanded an immediate and thorough response.
And respond they did. The Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), the principal institution responsible for managing Gurdwaras, acted with commendable swiftness. General Secretary Gurcharan Singh Cheema, a figure not shy about expressing his conviction, promptly announced the formation of a three-member investigation committee. Their mission was clear: visit the Banga shrine, conduct a meticulous audit, and ascertain the truth. This was no perfunctory glance; it was an urgent mission to reassure the sangat (congregation) and uphold the sanctity of their sacred spaces.
The committee, having completed its on-the-ground assessment, delivered its findings, and the news was, thankfully, reassuring. Cheema, speaking with a certain authority and a palpable sense of relief, declared unequivocally that "no anomaly" was found. Every single Saroop was accounted for. He emphasized that the Gurdwara had initially received forty-seven Saroops back in 2012, and after their rigorous physical verification, all forty-seven remained securely within the shrine. "The allegations are baseless," he stated, leaving little room for doubt.
In fact, Cheema went a step further, dismissing Bhai Kulwinder Singh’s claims as entirely unfounded and, significantly, politically motivated. He hinted that the former granthi’s accusations might stem from his own dismissal from service, suggesting a potential vendetta rather than genuine concern. "It seems like a deliberate attempt to defame the SGPC and sow discord within the community," Cheema elaborated, urging the sangat not to fall prey to such divisive tactics. It’s a sad reality, perhaps, that even sacred matters can sometimes become entangled in personal grievances or political maneuverings.
So, for now, the shadow of doubt that loomed over the Gurdwara Shri Charan Kanwal Sahib at Banga appears to have lifted. The SGPC’s investigation, culminating in Cheema's clear announcement, aims to put to rest the anxieties stirred by the allegations. It serves as a reminder of the profound sensitivity surrounding these sacred artifacts and the critical importance of transparent, swift action when such claims arise. Ultimately, the hope is that the community can now focus once again on the spiritual solace and guidance that the Saroops of Guru Granth Sahib so powerfully offer.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on