The Roar Fizzles: Why 'Singham Again' Couldn't Ignite the Diwali Box Office
Share- Nishadil
- November 17, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 4 Views
You know, sometimes even the grandest fireworks on Diwali fail to truly ignite the night sky. Such, it seems, is the perplexing tale of Rohit Shetty's much-hyped 'Singham Again,' a film that arrived with all the bombast one could imagine—a truly mammoth ensemble cast, the Shetty brand of action, and, of course, the festive cheer of Diwali. Yet, the initial box office numbers, honestly, tell a rather sobering story.
Day one, the film did manage to pull in a respectable ₹20.5 crore. A decent start, you could say, hinting at the potential. But then, almost as quickly as the celebratory crackers faded, so too did the film's momentum. Day two saw a noticeable dip, collecting around ₹15 crore. And by day three, well, the figures had slid further, settling at a rather muted ₹11.5 crore. Adding it all up, the cumulative collection for its opening weekend hovers around ₹47 crore.
Now, to put that into perspective, this is a movie boasting Ajay Devgn, Ranveer Singh, Deepika Padukone, Akshay Kumar, Tiger Shroff, and Kareena Kapoor. That's, frankly, a staggering lineup, practically an entire constellation of stars. One would expect, wouldn't they, a much more emphatic showing, especially against the backdrop of Diwali holidays? Interestingly enough, another major festive release, 'Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3,' managed to rake in ₹53.5 crore in the same three-day period. It's a bit of a head-scratcher, really, to see such a colossal production lagging behind.
What, then, is the takeaway? Is it perhaps a sign that even the most formidable star power, when piled high, isn't always enough to guarantee box office fireworks? Or could it be that audiences are now seeking something more, something beyond just sheer spectacle, even from a genre master like Rohit Shetty? It’s food for thought, certainly, as Bollywood continues its quest to understand what truly resonates with its ever-evolving audience.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on