The Price is Right: Why Restaurants Can't Overcharge for Packaged Water
Share- Nishadil
- January 14, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 4 Views
Victory for Diners: Chandigarh Commission Reaffirms No Overcharging Above MRP for Packaged Water
A recent ruling by the Chandigarh Consumer Commission has once again underscored a crucial consumer right: restaurants cannot charge more than the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) for packaged drinking water. This decision, awarding compensation to a diner, sends a clear message against unfair trade practices.
We’ve all been there, haven't we? You're enjoying a meal out, the conversation is flowing, and then the bill arrives. Your eyes scan the charges, and there it is: a bottle of water, usually a humble packaged item, priced significantly higher than what's printed on its label. That little pang of annoyance? It's a feeling many consumers know all too well. Well, here's some news that might just bring a smile to your face, especially if you're dining in Chandigarh, or really, anywhere across India where consumer rights are meant to be upheld.
In a significant move that champions the everyday diner, the Chandigarh Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission recently put its foot down, firmly declaring that restaurants simply cannot charge above the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) for packaged drinking water. This isn't just a gentle suggestion; it's a ruling that carries weight, coming after a diner took a stand against what he felt was an unfair practice. Imagine the scene: a bottle of Kinley water, with an MRP of Rs 20, being billed at Rs 40 at a popular eatery called Brooklyn Central. It's the kind of markup that just feels... well, wrong, isn't it?
Varinder Singh, the consumer in question, decided he wasn't going to let it slide. He lodged a complaint, arguing that charging double the printed price was an outright unfair trade practice and a clear deficiency in service. The restaurant, as expected, tried to defend its position, citing the usual arguments about 'service charges' and the 'ambience' provided. They even tried to lean on an old Delhi High Court ruling from 2017, which, let's be honest, has often been a point of confusion for both consumers and businesses. But the Commission wasn't having any of it.
The consumer forum’s stance was crystal clear: MRP is the maximum price, full stop. It's printed there for a reason, to set an upper limit beyond which no seller, be it a corner shop, a multiplex, or a fancy restaurant, can legally charge. The idea that a bottle of water magically doubles in value just because it's served in a nice glass at a table simply doesn't hold water, so to speak, in the eyes of the law. This ruling echoes a consistent position, with the same Chandigarh commission having made a similar declaration way back in 2017. So, this isn't new territory for them; it's a reaffirmation of a core consumer right.
In a tangible victory for Singh, the Commission awarded him Rs 3,000 in compensation – Rs 2,000 for the mental agony and harassment he endured, and another Rs 1,000 to cover his litigation costs. A small victory, perhaps, but a significant one that sends a strong message to establishments everywhere. It serves as a powerful reminder that consumers are not just passive recipients of services; they have rights, and those rights are enforceable.
So, what's the takeaway here for us, the everyday consumers? Don't be afraid to speak up. Understanding your rights regarding MRP can save you money and, more importantly, contribute to a fairer marketplace for everyone. Whether it’s a bottle of water, a packet of chips, or any other pre-packaged item, the price on the label is the law. This ruling isn't just about a few rupees; it’s about upholding a fundamental principle of consumer protection and ensuring that fairness isn't just a suggestion, but a mandate.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on