Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The Perilous Dance: How Political Parties Undermine Electoral Integrity and Imperil Democracy

  • Nishadil
  • August 22, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 7 Views
The Perilous Dance: How Political Parties Undermine Electoral Integrity and Imperil Democracy

In the vibrant, often tumultuous theatre of Indian democracy, the Election Commission of India (ECI) stands as a foundational pillar, tasked with upholding the sanctity of the ballot box. Yet, in recent times, a concerning trend has emerged: a persistent, almost ritualistic questioning of the ECI's impartiality and the very integrity of the electoral process by various political parties.

While healthy scrutiny is vital in any democracy, this sustained barrage of skepticism, often lacking substantiated evidence, risks a perilous 'self-sabotage' that threatens to unravel the collective faith in India's democratic foundations.

The narrative of doubt frequently centers around the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), once hailed as a technological marvel that streamlined elections and minimized rigging.

Despite repeated demonstrations by the ECI and validations by courts, allegations of tampering and vulnerability resurface with remarkable predictability after every major electoral outcome that doesn't favour certain parties. Beyond EVMs, the accuracy of voter lists, the timing of polls, and the enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct all become subjects of intense partisan debate, often escalating into public accusations against the Commission itself.

This relentless campaign of questioning, regardless of its factual basis, exacts a heavy toll.

Public trust, the bedrock upon which democratic institutions stand, begins to erode. When the very arbiter of free and fair elections is repeatedly portrayed as biased or compromised, citizens naturally grow cynical about the legitimacy of election results and the democratic process as a whole. Such widespread disillusionment creates fertile ground for political instability and can even undermine the peaceful transfer of power, a hallmark of mature democracies.

The irony inherent in this situation is profound.

Political parties, whose very existence and power depend on the integrity of elections, are inadvertently weakening the institution designed to protect that integrity. It is a classic case of 'self-sabotage' – in their zeal to challenge an unfavourable outcome or gain a political edge, parties risk sawing off the very branch they are sitting on.

A weakened, distrusted ECI serves no one in the long run, least of all the political actors who rely on its authority to validate their victories and legitimize their participation.

Instead of merely casting aspersions, a more constructive approach is imperative. Political parties should channel their concerns through official, institutional mechanisms, presenting concrete evidence for investigation rather than resorting to public vilification.

Furthermore, they should actively participate in electoral reforms, offering well-researched proposals to enhance transparency and efficiency. This collaborative spirit, focusing on improving the system rather than merely discrediting it, is essential for a robust democracy.

Beyond the actions of political parties, the ECI itself bears a significant responsibility.

To counter the narrative of doubt, it must redouble its efforts towards greater transparency and proactive communication. Providing more detailed explanations, engaging with civil society, and adopting reforms that enhance public confidence – such as expanding the scope of VVPAT verification or reviewing appointment processes – are crucial steps.

A perception of unimpeachable independence is as vital as actual independence.

Ultimately, the integrity of India's elections is a shared responsibility. Political parties must recognize that undermining the ECI is a dangerous gamble with democracy itself. Their role is not just to contest and win, but to nurture the institutions that make their participation possible.

By moving beyond reflexive criticism to constructive engagement and by upholding respect for the ECI, they can help safeguard the faith of millions in the power of their vote, ensuring that India's democratic journey remains robust and credible for generations to come.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on