The Murthys' Bold Stand: Why Infosys Founders Opted Out of Karnataka's Caste Survey

In a move that has garnered significant attention and sparked widespread discussion, Infosys co-founders N. R. Narayana Murthy and Sudha Murty recently opted out of the Karnataka socio-economic and educational survey, commonly referred to as the caste census. Their decision, firmly rooted in their long-held beliefs, underscores a critical debate surrounding identity, reservation policies, and the path to true social equity in India.

When enumerators approached their residence in Jayanagar, Bengaluru, the renowned philanthropists and business icons respectfully declined to participate in the caste-related questions.

Sudha Murty, an acclaimed author and former chairperson of the Infosys Foundation, articulated their position with clarity: “We are not from any backward community. We are Brahmins and forward class. We are not going to fill the column.” This statement not only clarified their personal identity but also highlighted their principled stance on the survey's relevance to their background.

Narayana Murthy, the visionary behind Infosys, further elaborated on his philosophy, which has consistently advocated for a merit-based and economically inclusive society.

He firmly stated, “I have always believed in opportunity for all. Reservations based on caste are not good. If it is based on economic backwardness, then it is good.” Murthy’s perspective champions a system where support is extended to those genuinely facing economic disadvantages, irrespective of their caste, thereby fostering a more equitable playing field for all citizens.

The ongoing Karnataka socio-economic and educational survey is an ambitious undertaking by the state government, aimed at collecting comprehensive data on the social, economic, and educational status of its population.

While the survey’s official results are yet to be released, it has already ignited vigorous public discourse regarding its methodology, objectives, and potential implications for policy-making, particularly concerning reservation quotas.

The Murthys' decision is not merely an individual choice but a powerful statement resonating with many who believe that the focus of affirmative action should shift from historical caste identities to contemporary economic realities.

Their consistent advocacy for opportunities based on merit and economic need rather than birthright adds a significant voice to the ongoing national conversation about how best to uplift marginalized sections of society and ensure inclusive growth. Their stand serves as a compelling reminder of the complex interplay between tradition, policy, and individual conviction in modern India.