Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The Long Shadow of Inaction: Eight Years Later, Karnataka Finally Confronts its Illegal Resort Problem

  • Nishadil
  • October 31, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 2 Views
The Long Shadow of Inaction: Eight Years Later, Karnataka Finally Confronts its Illegal Resort Problem

You know, some stories just make you scratch your head, wondering about the glacial pace of official action. Here we are, in Karnataka, a state blessed with incredible biodiversity, and we're talking about a problem that has festered for nearly a decade: the relentless, often illegal, creep of commercial establishments right into our most sensitive ecological zones. The very places, in truth, meant to be sanctuaries for wildlife, buffers against human encroachment.

It’s not as if no one noticed. Oh no, far from it. Eight years ago, back in 2015, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) — that’s our national financial watchdog, for those unfamiliar — released a report that was, to put it mildly, damning. It highlighted, with stark clarity, how illegal constructions, primarily resorts and homestays, were sprouting up in the eco-sensitive zones (ESZs) around our precious national parks and wildlife sanctuaries. And, crucially, it pointed fingers, noting the state’s rather dismal failure to monitor or regulate these burgeoning enterprises. Many, it found, were operating without so much as a proper nod of permission.

Fast forward to today, eight years on, and what has changed? Well, you could say the government has finally, decisively, asked the Forest Department to actually do something. Yes, the directive has landed: effectively monitor and take stringent action against these violators. Honestly, it begs the question: what took so long? Were the forests expected to police themselves?

These ESZs, by design, are not just arbitrary lines on a map. They are the protective rings, the critical buffer zones around our most treasured wildlife habitats—places like Bandipur, Nagarahole, the Biligiri Ranganathaswamy Temple (BRT) Tiger Reserve, the Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary, and even the serene Male Mahadeshwara Hills Wildlife Sanctuary. They exist precisely to absorb the shocks, to protect the core areas from the relentless pressures of development. Think of them as the lungs, or perhaps the shock absorbers, of our natural world.

But when these areas are choked by concrete and commerce, the impact is profound. Wildlife corridors, those vital pathways animals use to migrate and find food, are disrupted. Rivers and streams, the very lifelines of these ecosystems, become conduits for untreated waste. Noise pollution, light pollution – these aren't just annoyances for humans; they’re deeply unsettling, disorienting threats to creatures whose survival depends on natural rhythms. The CAG report, for its part, didn't shy away from detailing the utter lack of proper solid waste and water management plans in many of these establishments. It’s an ecological tragedy unfolding in plain sight.

So, what does this new directive mean? It’s a call to arms, of sorts, for the Forest Department to finally enforce the existing ESZ notifications. These notifications, issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), lay out in no uncertain terms what activities are prohibited and which are regulated within these zones. It's not about inventing new laws, but about applying the ones we already have, the ones that have, regrettably, been gathering dust for far too long.

There were whispers, you know, about a new state law to specifically regulate tourism in these areas. But those never quite materialized. So, for now, the onus is on strict enforcement of the existing framework. And it’s not just a matter of permits; it's about the very future of these incredible, irreplaceable natural spaces. It's about ensuring that eight years from now, we're not reading another report, another headline, lamenting yet more inaction. It’s high time, truly, for the forests and their silent inhabitants to finally get the protection they deserve.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on